TangoWhiskey
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 14,210
- Location
- Midlothian, TX
- Display Name
- 3Green
- Home Airfield
- KJWY - Mid-Way Regional
Keep in mind that the likely participants in this poll are pilots.
i dunno for less than the cost of a new boat or harley you can be a pilot. based on the number of people i know who boat and ride i have a hard time believing that its really "too expensive".
That's true too. I think many people just focus on the cost and effort to get the initial ticket. They don't think about what they are going to do afterwards. There's the "what now?" syndrome.You might be able to get the ticket, but you won't afford to use it or keep current. Have you seen the rental fleet lately? Either buy a plane, get in a partnership (buy a plane) or get into a flying club (buy a plane) or STOP FLYING.
That's were the expense lies, not the ticket.
you can pick up a nice 150 for about the same or less than a new harley.
you can pick up a nice 150 for about the same or less than a new harley.
i dunno for less than the cost of a new boat or harley you can be a pilot. based on the number of people i know who boat and ride i have a hard time believing that its really "too expensive".
Can you maintain, repair, insure, hangar and fuel for the same price as a Harley?
No.
If you figure in the price difference, they just about equal out.
Can you maintain, repair, insure, hangar and fuel for the same price as a Harley?
No.
The few folks I've been encouraging to learn to fly have all complained about cost to learn and the time required. The future rental costs isn't what is stopping them.
I don't see that. You can buy a new big Harley for $20,000-$25,000. What kind of 172 can you get for that price? One that is 30 years old? Plus you can put the Harley in your garage for no extra cost and go out and ride it whenever you want, not worrying about if both you and it are current.If you figure in the price difference, they just about equal out.
I agree the cost of acquiring a Harley is far less than that of a 172. I think the cost of ownership might be higher when you factor in all the cute little leatherman outfits that a Harley owner has to buy to try and look cool.I don't see that. You can buy a new big Harley for $20,000-$25,000. What kind of 172 can you get for that price? One that is 30 years old? Plus you can put the Harley in your garage for no extra cost and go out and ride it whenever you want, not worrying about if both you and it are current.
I agree the cost of acquiring a Harley is far less than that of a 172. I think the cost of ownership might be higher when you factor in all the cute little leatherman outfits that a Harley owner has to buy to try and look cool.![]()

![]()
![]()
Here's a disclaimer. I had some of those outfits and spent quite a bit of time on the back of a Harley in my younger years....

Yeah, but Scott was talking about GUYS in leather chaps. Sans pants perhaps?
![]()

Scott was.Yeah, but Scott was talking about GUYS in leather chaps. Sans pants perhaps?
![]()
You might be able to get the ticket, but you won't afford to use it or keep current. Have you seen the rental fleet lately? Either buy a plane, get in a partnership (buy a plane) or get into a flying club (buy a plane) or STOP FLYING.
That's were the expense lies, not the ticket.
You don't hand prop Ercoupes, and they don't run anywhere near 60K.
etc that is the real cost and often UNKNOWN
gotchas.
I think money is a large factor however there are many people who will spend the money it costs to get a private at the drop of a hat for, say, a new vehicle they don't need. My two cents is that many people perceive it as too much work and too many rules for a hobby.
That is with anything mechanical, not just aircraft. I wish my 10 year old car was as reliable as my 40 year old airplane was.
I think money is a large factor however there are many people who will spend the money it costs to get a private at the drop of a hat for, say, a new vehicle they don't need. My two cents is that many people perceive it as too much work and too many rules for a hobby.
This is the answer. If we want GA to succeed, we need to get the FAA to either relax the private pilot certificate rules, or make the Sport Pilot Certificate more useful, including night flight and faster speeds/higher loads.
Or eliminate useless tests for the private. Eliminate everything but the absolute basic safety items:
a) Can you land?
b) Can you navigate?
c) Can you recover from a stall/spin?
d) Can you find yourself when you're lost?
Remove s-turns, turns around a point, steep turns, etc. from Private, and add them to the Commercial certificate.
Then watch the number of pilots come around. More accidents? Probably, but that's because there will be more pilots.
We need to take the "exclusivity" out of airplanes, and make it feasible for the common man.
Eliminating the TSA and removing the FAA's authority over us would help too.
You don't hand prop Ercoupes, and they don't run anywhere near 60K.
This is the answer. If we want GA to succeed, we need to get the FAA to either relax the private pilot certificate rules, or make the Sport Pilot Certificate more useful, including night flight and faster speeds/higher loads.

This is the answer. If we want GA to succeed, we need to get the FAA to either relax the private pilot certificate rules, or make the Sport Pilot Certificate more useful, including night flight and faster speeds/higher loads.