To start, I did not know much about insurance claims until this winter. Maybe lucky, but in the past 50+ years have had only one insured loss for a roof and that was thirty years back. We started an auto accident claim with the "lizard" company this past fall and into winter. The things I have learned, would fill a book. So, Im going to pass on a few tidbits. Finality. If one is in a state that has a Finality type of insurace settlement, once it is signed, that is the end of the end and no more claim for the same loss can ever be raised. I am in a state like that. Do be extra careful and don't rush to sign.
Next, an auto claim will be two or more separate claims. One for the property damage and another for each person. We had three people in the car so four different claims. But - the insurer may try to enclose a "blanket" release for payment on ONE claim that affects all other claims(sneaky).
The full, limited, partial, and no liability options. Of course the lizards wanted a full liability release. I sent a Demand letter that was specific that I would release the insurer from further claims, but would never, in a million years release the driver or her adult guardian from money claim liability. Of course the lizards said it had to be all or nothing, so I told them, ok I will put the insurer BACK on the hook for further injury claim. Which they turned around and said "policy limits" is our offer. Our claim is five times the insurace limits, so we can't have it both ways. Either you pay the limits and the driver accepts responsibility for the remainder or you don't. And the lizard claims guy said they can't sever liability. That is a lie.
We have been deadlocked on driver liability for months and just now got an email saying they will "good faith" negotiate on behalf of the driver and family for any further compensation over policy limits. It is like knocking down the Berlin wall with a claw hammer, but it can be done.
What helps. If the at-fault is without question 100% on the other driver, as in our case. Have access to a lawyer on retainer and NOT a percent of settlement. This is hard to find but so far my atty expense is $1100 and we are close to the end now with the property settled from the first offer of $14,700 now $30,850. I expect the injury claim from the driver two families to add at least another $100,000+ over the lizard payment. So, take your time, reject any legal document that is 7 pages of boilerplate(we demanded and got 'plain language' settlement). And keep pushing if you know you are in the right and are zero at-fault. What an education in weasel behavior by a billion $$$$$ company. Oh, and we are on our seventh claims adjuster because the rules for the first ones were limited to saying 'no'. Getting to the 'yes' person takes effort, but there is a yes person there, just have to go through many 'no' people.
Next, an auto claim will be two or more separate claims. One for the property damage and another for each person. We had three people in the car so four different claims. But - the insurer may try to enclose a "blanket" release for payment on ONE claim that affects all other claims(sneaky).
The full, limited, partial, and no liability options. Of course the lizards wanted a full liability release. I sent a Demand letter that was specific that I would release the insurer from further claims, but would never, in a million years release the driver or her adult guardian from money claim liability. Of course the lizards said it had to be all or nothing, so I told them, ok I will put the insurer BACK on the hook for further injury claim. Which they turned around and said "policy limits" is our offer. Our claim is five times the insurace limits, so we can't have it both ways. Either you pay the limits and the driver accepts responsibility for the remainder or you don't. And the lizard claims guy said they can't sever liability. That is a lie.
We have been deadlocked on driver liability for months and just now got an email saying they will "good faith" negotiate on behalf of the driver and family for any further compensation over policy limits. It is like knocking down the Berlin wall with a claw hammer, but it can be done.
What helps. If the at-fault is without question 100% on the other driver, as in our case. Have access to a lawyer on retainer and NOT a percent of settlement. This is hard to find but so far my atty expense is $1100 and we are close to the end now with the property settled from the first offer of $14,700 now $30,850. I expect the injury claim from the driver two families to add at least another $100,000+ over the lizard payment. So, take your time, reject any legal document that is 7 pages of boilerplate(we demanded and got 'plain language' settlement). And keep pushing if you know you are in the right and are zero at-fault. What an education in weasel behavior by a billion $$$$$ company. Oh, and we are on our seventh claims adjuster because the rules for the first ones were limited to saying 'no'. Getting to the 'yes' person takes effort, but there is a yes person there, just have to go through many 'no' people.

