Insurability of low time commercial-aspirant

Discussion in 'Flight Following' started by Let'sgoflying!, Mar 13, 2023.

  1. Let'sgoflying!

    Let'sgoflying! Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    19,497
    Location:
    west Texas

    Display name:
    Dave Taylor
    A new pilot who is working on instrument and commercial & whose goal is to fly either Pt91 or 135; not 121 - is asking;

    What is he going to be more immediately insurable in;
    a cabin class piston twin, or one of the SE turbines (Malibu, maybe a TBM)?

    I suppose this question can be restated as, which would the insurance companies require less hours, less training, maybe less sim time in, before he would be set loose, solo?

    (He asks about these specific a/c types because of actual opportunities he is being told will possibly be available down the road - yes they are vastly different aircraft in price, capability etc.)
     
  2. TCABM

    TCABM En-Route

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2013
    Messages:
    4,016

    Display name:
    3G
     
  3. mandm

    mandm Cleared for Takeoff PoA Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2020
    Messages:
    1,096
    Location:
    Chicago

    Display name:
    Michael
    I was quoted on a multi without commercial or multi rating. The rate was about 2-2.5 times that of my single piston complex and the value on the multi was at least double that of my piston. So I don’t think getting insurance is an issue on a non-pressurized multi.
     
  4. mondtster

    mondtster En-Route

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2011
    Messages:
    4,421

    Display name:
    mondtster
    I personally haven't been in this position recently but based on my observations while working with some folks who have been in this position in the past few years the problem is likely more of an issue about what is an affordable insurance premium and less of an issue with outright insurability.

    The premiums are likely going to be less for a cabin class piston twin than they are for the turbine single but that may vary a bit depending on what the hull values are of the aircraft in question.
     
    TCABM likes this.
  5. TCABM

    TCABM En-Route

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2013
    Messages:
    4,016

    Display name:
    3G
    It’s not 1978. A wet commercial is going to be hard to insure.
     
  6. lsaway

    lsaway Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2019
    Messages:
    411

    Display name:
    lsaway
    It sounds like your friend is not going to be buying one of these planes and trying to insure himself. Sounds like he is wanting to work for a part 91 or 135, so these companies are going to have their insurance requirements, and they are not all going to be the same.
     
    Mongoose Aviator and mondtster like this.
  7. MauleSkinner

    MauleSkinner Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2005
    Messages:
    13,824
    Location:
    Wichita, KS

    Display name:
    MauleSkinner
    I would have him ask the employers holding the actual opportunities what their minimums are if that’s what he’s basing his question on.

    I would suspect in today’s market, either one would accept a pilot with the 1200-hour IFR 135 minimums.
     
    Jim Carpenter, TCABM and mondtster like this.
  8. Let'sgoflying!

    Let'sgoflying! Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    19,497
    Location:
    west Texas

    Display name:
    Dave Taylor
    Yikes, that would change his plan a lot.
    It doesn't sound like (what I imagined) 500TT, 50 in type is going to cut it. Either SE turbine, or piston ME correct?

    Does it change much if he only does the Pt91 business part of it now, and leave the Pt135 plans til later?
     
  9. MauleSkinner

    MauleSkinner Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2005
    Messages:
    13,824
    Location:
    Wichita, KS

    Display name:
    MauleSkinner
    I doubt that 500 hours is going to result in a turbine or cabin-class multi PIC slot.
     
    Zeldman and Let'sgoflying! like this.
  10. WDD

    WDD En-Route

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2019
    Messages:
    4,520
    Location:
    Atlanta / KRYY

    Display name:
    Vintage Snazzy (so my adult children say)
    Sounds like in addition to Instrument and Commercial, he/she will need to get the CFI/CFII and spend a few years building hours teaching.
     
  11. texasclouds

    texasclouds En-Route

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2018
    Messages:
    3,038
    Location:
    Bryan, Texas

    Display name:
    Mark
    At 1000 hrs, we hire SIC for our part 135 Citation II. Multi time can be minimal, insurance wants 1000 tt.
     
    kaiser and Let'sgoflying! like this.
  12. Rgbeard

    Rgbeard En-Route

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2017
    Messages:
    4,069
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ and Ensenada, Mexico

    Display name:
    rgbeard
    500 hrs qualifies you for a bannertow job for another thousand!