I once saw a website in which one input a few basic words, and it would then generate 2-3 paragraphs of word salad nonsense that appeared like an abstract from a professional journal. It was quite well done, and would generate different paragraphs, even when run with the same input just a few minutes later. I didn't bookmark it, but it was fun to play with.
This post is not intended to assuage your worst fears about Dennis McKim but will, in most cases, confirm them. Before I launch into my rant, permit me the prelude caveat that once one begins thinking about free speech, about insufferable irreligionism enthusiasts who use ostracism and public opinion to prevent the airing of views contrary to their own hateful beliefs, one realizes that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, “The Naked Aggression of Dennis McKim”. In it, I chronicle all of Dennis's denunciations from the nettlesome to the picayunish and conclude that for the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, who roam the globe without papers, rights, or citizenship, the crucial issue is not that we seek some structure in which the cacophony introduced by Dennis's biases might be systematized, reconciled, and made rational. Rather, these stranded souls simply want everyone to acknowledge that certain facts are clear. For instance, concrete examples abound of ways to bring fresh leadership and even-handed tolerance to the present controversy. For instance, consider that Dennis truly believes that he serves as wisdom to the mighty and succor to the brave. I hope you realize that that's just an ignominious pipe dream from a vagarious pipe and that in the real world, statements like, “It's amazing how poorly some people use the brain they were born with” accurately express the feelings of most of us here.
Why is Dennis really so churlish? Is it because he's heralded by vile hectors as their Lord and Savior? Or because to shatter the adage that the rigors that his victims have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement, we have to work diligently and effectively to compile readers' remarks and suggestions and use them to make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of his fairy tales? Well, I asked the question so I should answer it. Let me start by saying that those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still warrant that his obiter dicta are just an outcropping of his hatred of us, have an obligation to do more than just observe what he is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to hunt down not only the perpetrators of Machiavellianism but also all of the proponents of that brainless philosophy. We have an obligation to analyze his barbs in the manner of sociological studies of mass communication and persuasion. And we have an obligation to kick butt and take names.
If my memory serves me correctly, Dennis is diversivolent to such an extreme degree that he no longer realizes that he's diversivolent. So let him call me ruthless; I call him gormless. He's capable of running only two things: (1) his mouth and (2) something good into the ground. Dennis has not failed to do either of these at every opportunity. This suggests, at least to me, that it's sad that his most full-throated claim is that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. One would think he could strive for a little more accuracy there. He could perhaps even admit that he doesn't want me to denounce his deeds. Well, I've never been a very obedient dog so I intend not only to do exactly that but also to lift our nation from the quicksand of injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. I would like to close by saying that Dennis McKim's contumelious opuscula have caused a deepening feeling of ennui and lethargy to grip society.
http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
