I'm holding out hope that since this is an actual change to the state constitution and not a regulatory change, there will be a better chance of this succeeding.
"Succeeding at what?" is the question that remains.
I'm holding out hope that since this is an actual change to the state constitution and not a regulatory change, there will be a better chance of this succeeding.
"Succeeding at what?" is the question that remains.
Less waste in spending? Money being allocated within the guidelines?
Arkansas has always had the worst highways, I'd avoid them like the plague when I was driving.
Honestly the gas tax is the best way to do it. It's the closest you're going to come to a true pay proportional to use system. Heavier vehicles burn more gas so you pay more tax. Drive a lot.... more gas, more tax. Drive a super fuel efficient car across town once a week.... less gas, less road wear, less tax paid. Built in incentives for hybrids.
I don't want to pay by gross weight, that's BS. I have a heavy truck that I drive rarely... mostly to haul/tow things or when there's heavy snow. I probably put <5k miles on it. Yet I'm going to pay the same as another guy who drove 100k? I don't like it.
Pay by the mile? Great now I've got to start logging my miles or dealing with some kind of transponder. I actually own several older vehicles that are pretty much hobby cars. Am I going to have to fit everything I own with this transponder or pay by axle or gross weight on a vehicle that is driven <1k/year?
This all just sounds like a lot of hassle, new infrastructure, and bureaucracy..... headaches waiting to happen. Just raise the fuel tax enough to cover things and be done with it.
Acting like any tax is paying for something specific (the premise of the original question) is disingenuous in a world where all of the taxes combined don't cover the interest payment on the spending.