While AC 61-9B is focused primarily on complex and multiengine aircraft, it is still very useful for HP checkouts, too. You may also find this AvWeb article instructive.
shoot the AC isn't available
...and when you click on the link you come to a page that describes the AC and informs the readerSure it is. Go to www.faa.gov....AC's are available from the home page. Don't be deterred by the fact that the first one listed is 61-117...just scroll down to find 61-98.
Bob Gardner
Yep. That's intended as a guide for all transitions and definitely fits the bill.What about AC 61-103 that recommends the GAMA transition training syllabus for pilots transitioning to high performance and complex aircraft.
http://www.gama.aero/files/GAMA Publication 5 Transition Training Revised.pdf
Not a CFI, and don't really want to read 39 pages for you but at a glance it looks like it would be easily modified to fit your needs.
I'm not sure "robbery" is an apt description. The CFI who says, "I know what the rules are, I just choose to apply my own instead" is pretty rare.Make sure to not rob your students of pic time while getting checked out like many instructors do.
...and when you click on the link you come to a page that describes the AC and informs the reader
This document's content is not currently available.
I hear that can happen to those older ACs
Still free from other sources.My Summit Aviation Library CD has it in full. No free lunch, I guess.
Bob
While AC 61-9B is focused primarily on complex and multiengine aircraft, it is still very useful for HP checkouts, too. You may also find this AvWeb article instructive.
What one has to learn to check out in such planes really hasn't changed since then, so that will still do just fine as a guide for what to cover.Hopefully he can get some reference material dated after 1974.
You must be very, very old to think something from 1974 could possibly be relevant!What one has to learn to check out in such planes really hasn't changed since then, so that will still do just fine as a guide for what to cover.
You must be very, very old to think something from 1974 could possibly be relevant!
Perhaps so, but I do think it. The syllabus in that AC is just as good now as it was then, and I doubt there's any one better.You must be very, very old to think something from 1974 could possibly be relevant!
You do realize this older guy was being facetious, don't you?Perhaps so, but I do think it. The syllabus in that AC is just as good now as it was then, and I doubt there's any one better.