Garmin pilot tutorials?

MountainDude

Cleared for Takeoff
PoA Supporter
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
1,466
Display Name
MountainDude
Home Airfield
KPDX
Going to switch to GP from FF.
Can you please point out the resources (videos, instructions...) for most efficient learning of GP, which I have never used?
Thank you
 
Going to switch to GP from FF.

 
Garmin often has Webexes to go over basic GP usage and I’m sure you can find plenty on YouTube. Or use it for a flight or two and have it down pat in no time.
 
A former Jeppesen now Thoma Bravo employee (not FF) is going to do a "new features" of FF for our pilot group next month. I haven't asked if he's still planning on it.
 
It's four years old not, but this is Garmin's playlist for Pilot.


Because there have been additional features since then (most notable SmartCharts), you probably want to look beyond, but this will be a solid introduction to an app that has much of the functionality but a very different flow than Foreflight.

And, I agree with @AlleyCat67. The Pilot Facebook group is one of the good ones.
 
Going to switch to GP from FF.
Can you please point out the resources (videos, instructions...) for most efficient learning of GP, which I have never used?
The single best thing you can do is link GP on your device to a flight simulator such as MSFS or X-Plane. Then just have the simulator do an autopilot flight while you fool around with GP as it reacts exactly as it would for a regular flight.

If that's not possible, just play with it. GP is pretty intuitive. I'd start with the context wheel that pops up when you long-press on the map. Drag it around and see how it can show you what matters in that location. Two fingers to measure distance and (if you've added your aircraft to GP) fuel/time etc. You can explore the layers and overlays.

I found that about an hour of fooling around with it taught me most of what I needed to know on a regular basis, and I picked up the rest over the course of a few flights. If you have Garmin avionics (particularly a Garmin EIS), you can get a lot of data. GP sends everything automatically to Savvy and FlySto for me, for easy review as desired.

It's a solid program. I tried FF and it was...fine, I guess. Went with GP and haven't looked back.
 
To the extent it helps anyone, I wrote this several months ago to answer a question by someone who was then thinking of switching because of Garmin SmartCharts. It also pretty much reflects how I have come to use the two apps. FF for planning and quick reference in the ground. Pilot in flight.

I subscribe to both. I love the Smart Charts but I would not make a “permanent” switch from one to the other for a single feature.​
​
FF and GP (for iOS) are both excellent EFBs. For most of what people use, there is functional parity. Most of the differences lie in flow - how one gets to the features they want.​

Easy example is flight planning. In FF, it’s based on the map. Add waypoints, remove waypoints, look at the mods you did before, pull up procedures and add or delete them, etc etc etc. GP flight planning, OTOH, takes place on a flight plan page that has an interface and functionality similar to the latest Garmin navigators. One is not objectively better or worse than the other, but Pilot A may like the Garmin better because of similarity to their GTN; Pilot B might like the less structured FF method.​
​
If you are new to EFBs, a switch may not make any difference. But if you have gotten used to one or the other’s form and flow, the differences and learning curve might be a little frustrating, How much varies with the person. How I or anyone else use either or both is irrelevant to you. Best bet is do a trial and decide for yourself.​
 
Easy example is flight planning. In FF, it’s based on the map. Add waypoints, remove waypoints, look at the mods you did before, pull up procedures and add or delete them, etc etc etc. GP flight planning, OTOH, takes place on a flight plan page that has an interface and functionality similar to the latest Garmin navigators. One is not objectively better or worse than the other, but Pilot A may like the Garmin better because of similarity to their GTN; Pilot B might like the less structured FF method.
Not sure if there has been a change since you wrote this, but for fun just I created a cross-country including adding enroute points and an arrival procedure without ever leaving the map page in GP. The little magneta/dashed-line symbol on the radial menu puts you into graphical FPL editing mode which lets you tap to add waypoints, drag to edit the flight path as needed, and add altitude constraints, off-track offsets, arrivals, and approaches. Not sure if you were referencing something else, but it appears that using the map page or the flight plan page are both excellent options depending on whether you want to do it graphically or just enter a list of previously-determined waypoints by identifier.
 
Not sure if there has been a change since you wrote this, but for fun just I created a cross-country including adding enroute points and an arrival procedure without ever leaving the map page in GP. The little magneta/dashed-line symbol on the radial menu puts you into graphical FPL editing mode which lets you tap to add waypoints, drag to edit the flight path as needed, and add altitude constraints, off-track offsets, arrivals, and approaches. Not sure if you were referencing something else, but it appears that using the map page or the flight plan page are both excellent options depending on whether you want to do it graphically or just enter a list of previously-determined waypoints by identifier.
Have you used both? If you have, you obviously don't see the degree of difference I do. Which is a good thing.
 
Have you used both? If you have, you obviously don't see the degree of difference I do. Which is a good thing.
My FF experience is limited to the 30-day trail, so my knowledge is pretty incomplete. My impression during that trial was that it was powerful but that the UI really didn't work for me in the way that GP did. Certainly the desktop planning app was great (and something Garmin is only now really working on replicating).

I think my point was that a flight can actually be created entirely from the map page in GP, rather than just the FPL page.
 
Been using FF since 2106, went to all the FF forums at Sun n Fun and Oshkosh. I think I know it pretty good and I like it a little better than GP.
I also know how to use GP but not as well as FF. I am going to start flying with GP more now even though I just resubscribed to FF 4 months ago.
I use GP to transfer my data bases each month is the original reason I have it. I plan to switch to garmin permanently soon. Will still use FF on the computer to flight plan until it expiries.
 
At this point I just want to go flying. I don't care what software is involved.

On Thursday, January 15, 2026, Denver experienced significant high winds, with gusts between 35-50 mph in the metro area,
At this timestamp:
KCFO: 161847Z 33022G31KT 10SM CLR 02/M16 A3008
KDEN: 161853Z 33021G33KT 10SM FEW090 FEW120 BKN220 02/M17 A3003 RMK AO2 PK WND 33033/1845 SLP183 T00221172

A cold front moving through late Thursday night further increased winds, with gusts up to 65-70 mph expected across the plains into Friday afternoon. (today!)
 
My FF experience is limited to the 30-day trail, so my knowledge is pretty incomplete. My impression during that trial was that it was powerful but that the UI really didn't work for me in the way that GP did. Certainly the desktop planning app was great (and something Garmin is only now really working on replicating).

I think my point was that a flight can actually be created entirely from the map page in GP, rather than just the FPL page.
Yes, ultimately most of it can. I was really referring to the focus of the apps and that differences reflected where they started from. That's why one's UI worked better for you than the other.

It happens in many industries. Competing products that reflect their origins. For a non-aviation example I was very familiar with, I used to work for a banking software company that acquired two competing products. Historically, one began as a Reg Z (consumer) compliant complex loan calculator; the other as a document generator. Even years later, when both were doing full loan packages, it was easy to see the differences, whether you were working in development, processing the loans as a banker, or reading them as a consumer.
 
Back
Top