What I meant was a little sarcastic, but let me explain:
I'm fairly new around here and had to do a bit of homework on the subject so please excuse the rudimentary $.02 (no pun intended).
From what I can tell, there are those that have made the guy a 'boogie man' for what he may or may not be legally guilty (in a court of law) of doing to undermine the confidence of speculators in the aircraft trading industry. Notice that I emphasize legal culpability, as I acknowledge that there is a difference in legal responsibility versus moral and ethical (which also sometimes diverge).
I'm not making light of anyone's losses (nor am I implying that he did anything wrong - I don't know the facts) so forgive if it comes across that way, however my point is that things have a way of coming back to equilibrium.
When I asked about aircraft values, I meant that as a way of suggesting (jestfully) that he was single handedly responsbile for the depressed aircraft market and that finally things will start to turn around for those that want to sell and they can do so at huge profits.
I highly doubt it.