My picks:
1. Alabama (I'm partial but Bama is undefeated & ranked No 1 all year)
2.Ohio St (they good, Penn St beat them but OSU the better team)
3. Clemson
4. Washington
Hate to say it, but at this time, I believe Oklahoma belongs.
I agree with this. Everyone but Alabama has shown some flaws this season. I don't think there's a strong case to include a 2 loss team over any of the 1 loss teams.
Bama has flaws and can be beat.
I haven't followed college football since I was a college student and that was 36 years ago. It was fun to cheer on the school's team while I was attending a school but once I graduated I never saw the point.
They need an actual tournament much like every other sport does that will get rid of this confusion every year.
I would like to see something like they do in Europe, the top three or four teams from every conference enter a championship where they play other teams that have earned the right to be there instead of other teams that are randomly chosen by bookies.
There are some other interesting matchups. USC vs. PSU in the Rose, and we get to find out if W. Michigan is for real when they play a good Wisconsin team.
Too bad . . . OSU don't belong . . .
Give it ten years and you will be watching soccer. In 'Murica, it has already passed hockey as the fourth biggest sport. The nfl will have no choice but to fold up here shortly, especially when all the lawsuits start flowing in from the concussions. When that happens college footy will follow.If we did it like Europe the ball would be round. Thank you, NO! Seems like there was an election recently where 'mericans chose to be less European.
I'm with Clemson this year for only one reason: If Clemson wins, my nieces/nephews will all have had NCAA champion teams while they were there. That's kind of cool. For me it was Baseball (CSUF). Of course the best was the year my Brother (their father) was on the NCAA champion Water Polo team.
Give it ten years and you will be watching soccer. In 'Murica, it has already passed hockey as the fourth biggest sport. The nfl will have no choice but to fold up here shortly, especially when all the lawsuits start flowing in from the concussions. When that happens college footy will follow.
Only in the good old USA is a team labeled the champion when they never have to face the best teams.
Hate to say it, but at this time, I believe Oklahoma belongs.
I haven't followed college football since I was a college student and that was 36 years ago. It was fun to cheer on the school's team while I was attending a school but once I graduated I never saw the point.
Well, in any event, Texas is no where near a bowl game. As it should be.
I'd much rather watch college ball than a bunch of prima donna crybabies in the pros, at least as far as football/basketball are concerned.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No to mentioned being grossly overpaid jerks for the most part.
Cheers
They will in the next year or so if the wealthy boosters get the **** out of the way!
You saying that you don't like Red McCombs?
Well, in any event, Texas is no where near a bowl game. As it should be.
Give it ten years and you will be watching soccer. In 'Murica, it has already passed hockey as the fourth biggest sport. The nfl will have no choice but to fold up here shortly, especially when all the lawsuits start flowing in from the concussions. When that happens college footy will follow.
Only in the good old USA is a team labeled the champion when they never have to face the best teams.
Bama has flaws and can be beat. Ohio St vs Bama scares me. Even Clemson vs Bama would be interesting re: last year.
You're on the PoA Council, so I'll refrain from telling you to kiss my burnt orange ass!
From your keyboard to God's ears.
Bob
This guy?
Texas booster calls Charlie Strong hire 'a kick in the face'
Texas billionaire booster Red McCombs bashed the hire of Charlie Strong in a radio interview on Monday.
Don't know anyone there, including him, but that's the deal going around that boosters need to stay out of the way . . . I often wonder how Saban gets around it at Bama. I have my idea as I don't think anyone wants to get on his bad side.
Saban had been winning national championships, that always keeps even the wealthiest boosters from being too vocal. I wish OU boosters would be MORE involved so we could get MStoops ****-canned.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When you're winning year after year, the boosters stay pretty content! I'm not a bama fan, but he's the best coach/recruiter in college football!True but I think Saban laid out how the program would be operated and that he would have total control over it if Bama wanted him. Well Bama wanted him bad and I would guess they accepted his conditions. It's worked out well of course, and I'm sure what you wrote has kept the wolves (boosters) at bay.
When you're winning year after year, the boosters stay pretty content! I'm not a bama fan, but he's the best coach/recruiter in college football!