Cessna Will Offer Epic Optix Low Cost HUD

Discussion in 'Avionics and Upgrades' started by Sinistar, Apr 15, 2018.

  1. Sinistar

    Sinistar Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2016
    Messages:
    690
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Brad
    This short article came across my newfeed:

    https://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/Cessna-Will-Offer-Epic-Optixs-Low-Cost-HUD-230669-1.html

    So it would seem since this is a portable, that Cessna will just sell it at a discount but it is not installed, certified equipment?

    So what is the potential value of a non-certified HUD to a GA VFR pilot? How about IFR pilot? I'm guessing it needs Foreflight but not sure.

    Too bad it so large looking. When I think of HUD's they seem rather small and unobtrustive but I supposed all the other parts are probably down below the dash.
     
  2. Velocity173

    Velocity173 Final Approach

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Messages:
    8,838
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Velocity173
    Obstructive and extraneous information in my opinion. If you’re flying IFR, then just fly off your panel. So your head is tilted down slightly. Not really an inconvenience. Not like you could fly IFR off this HUD anyway. If you’re flying VFR, then 90 % of the time you should be looking outside anyway. A quick glance inside for engine instruments isn’t hard.

    Flown hundreds of hours of NVG HUD. The symbology is just an annoyance. It’s tech for gadget geeks.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2018
  3. frfly172

    frfly172 Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Messages:
    11,641
    Location:
    mass fla
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    ron keating
    With all the glass in the panel,not sure I’m ready for HUD.
     
  4. Sinistar

    Sinistar Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2016
    Messages:
    690
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Brad
    I have zero interest in having this...was just curious what value it would potentially add. It is so big I think it would be very intrusive. Plus I think one would tend to not look st instruments often enough.

    Now I could see a fancy Gxxx series certified Garmin gadget driving it, the extra hardware behind the panel and someone like Cirrus offering it nicely integrated.
     
  5. GRG55

    GRG55 En-Route

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2015
    Messages:
    4,164
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Aztec Flyer
    I'd like to hear the opinions of pilots (mostly military, I would assume?) who have actual HUD time, and how that might translate into something useful for GA.

    - for IFR, how is it advantageous to the current synthetic vision options?
    - for a VFR pilot is there any real advantage? (Maybe projecting the AOA might reduce loss of control accidents?)

    The Boeing 787 has a HUD. My brother, who has thousands of hours of HUD time in the military, likes it for low viz hand flown approaches. But he said a lot of the pilots, especially those who came out of Airbuses, don't.
     
  6. Velocity173

    Velocity173 Final Approach

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Messages:
    8,838
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Velocity173
    Yeah, if it was slaved to the aircraft’s flight instruments & avionics, that’s one thing. This is just a feed from a tablet. I wouldn’t fly IFR solely off a WiFi input from a tablet. I’d rather gaze 6 inches lower to a full color glass SVT panel vs green monochrome imagery.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2018
  7. Banjo33

    Banjo33 Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    549
    Location:
    MS
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Banjo33
    For me, I like that it simplifies the instrument to visual transition as you’re already looking over the nose of the aircraft. Everything you need (attitude, airspeed, altitude, heading, AOA) is right there in your face. The second and most important aspect of the HUD that most of us use is the Velocity Vector. The little airplane silhouette overlaid on a gyro stabilized pitch ladder that shows you what your airplane is currently doing (climb, descend, turn), where it is going (put the velocity vector on the approach end of the runway, change nothing, and that’s where you’ll impact), and is frequently combined with some type of AOA reference (how much excess/deficient energy do I have on the airplane and is it changing). There’s probably other things to, but those come to mind first...
     
  8. steingar

    steingar Touchdown! Greaser!

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2007
    Messages:
    24,361
    Location:
    Land of Savages
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    steingar
    Yeah, right. Extraneous, redundant, useless. That's why every military aircraft flown by the US has one. You bet.
     
  9. Velocity173

    Velocity173 Final Approach

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Messages:
    8,838
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Velocity173
    Every military aircraft in the US doesn’t have one and the ones that do, have it slaved to on board systems. This HUD doesn’t do that. Also, the nature of tactical military ops require the pilot to be focused outside (targeting, carrier landing, NOE). A guy flying his VFR Cessna doesn’t require that sort of attention to instruments. It’s just gadget overkill.

    Even the one that I used, the instrumentation isn’t intuitive. You have to focus in on the HUD and refocus to the outside viewing area. It’s easier to just to concentrate on the outside viewing area and occasionally glance inside to easy to read panel instruments.

    8ED2E98C-2956-45D4-85E7-87EA4A733774.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2018 at 12:15 PM
    TCABM and Grum.Man like this.
  10. dell30rb

    dell30rb Final Approach

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    6,864
    Location:
    Raleigh NC
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Ren
    It seems awkward. No airspeed indications. You'll have to keep glancing back at your panel for that. The velocity vector is nice, but it would be just as nice on a synthetic vision panel display.

    A built-in HUD with airspeed, barometric altitude, links to the aircraft systems is great. It seems they are working on ways to interface it with the aircraft instruments.
     
  11. Ryan F.

    Ryan F. Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2016
    Messages:
    422
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Ryan Ferguson 1974
    Without air data, this HUD is undoubtedly a toy. I looked into this fairly extensively since the announcement since I am one of those "HUD" people. But I use the HUD for very specific applications, and without air data it's a useless tool. It's only marginally useful with air data if it doesn't include navigation, which Epic Optix's tool doesn't appear to do beyond whatever can be output from an iPad. I also looked through the process to get the Epic Optix Eagle up and running. It's a seventeen step process of dinking with the iPad, setting up Airplay (yes, screen mirroring is how this works) and so on.

    This is not ready for prime time. It's just a toy right now, but a better iteration may be coming.

    To be clear, I'm not anti-HUD, nor am I anti-HUD for GA. I just think the benefits of the HUD are from a true integrated display on the combiner, not a half-ass ADI only with ground speed and GPS altitude instead of true air data.
     
  12. Velocity173

    Velocity173 Final Approach

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Messages:
    8,838
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Velocity173
    I agree, I’m not anti HUD either. It has its place mostly in military aviation due to the flight profiles they do.

    For civilian flying I don’t see much of a benefit other than those doing hard IFR or those that fly a lot at night. In that case, I would want EVS along with integration with certified instruments/ avionics. That ain’t gonna happen for 2K.

    http://www.gulfstream.com/product-support/product-enhancements/enhanced-vision-system
     
  13. Ryan F.

    Ryan F. Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2016
    Messages:
    422
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Ryan Ferguson 1974
    That's the exact system I use for work, HUD II with EVS. It's a nice unit, but I still only use it selectively. EVS is the main benefit. We take advantage of the 100 foot allowance for EVS, which makes it feel almost like a Cat II approach in some situations.

    I suppose very precise flying via the HUD symbology FD is possible, but I feel pretty precise with a PFD, too.

    The idea behind the HUD is to put everything in one place so you don't have to look away while you're flying. When it only puts "some" of what you need on the combiner, or worse yet, information you can't/shouldn't use (such as ground speed and GPS altitude) it's more of a liability than a benefit.

    But it's nice to see we're moving ahead with technology in GA. This is just the first crack at it; there will be more, and better options over time.
     
    Velocity173 likes this.
  14. NordicDave

    NordicDave Pre-takeoff checklist

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2015
    Messages:
    166
    Location:
    San Jose
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    NordicDave
    Loved the demo video.... The pilot was transfixed staring through the HUD and not looking around. Peripheral vision goes to ZERO with the tunnel vision through this device.
     
  15. Sinistar

    Sinistar Line Up and Wait

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2016
    Messages:
    690
    Display Name:

    Display name:
    Brad
    Check out the parallel thread on the Hangar Talk subforum by @WannFly....I was transfixed too....on the 182 pilot :) I think Steveo was too!!! They only talked about the HUD for a few minutes.