Unregistered said:
I'm supposed to have a test called Cardiolite later this month. My physcian says he wants to check due to my family history and age. Is this something I should be worried about as a pilot ? If nothing abnormal is found, do I have to specifically report having it done even if it's a part of my annual physical ?
Well, the results are in and they are good. I got 97% of my heart-rate. I could have gotten to 100% but my doctor said it wasn't necessary. 14.2 METs on the Bruce protocol.
Test status: normal (stress) normal (rest)
Rhythm: normal (stress) normal (rest)
IV Conduction: normal (stress) normal (rest)
Arrhythmias: none (stress) none (rest)
ST response: normal
Repolarization: normal
Myocardial perfusion was normal
Scan Significance: normal & indicates a very low risk for hard cardiac events
LAD: 0% (stress) 0% (rest) 0% (Ischemic)
LCx: 0% (stress) 0% (rest) 0% (Ischemic)
RCA: 0% (stress) 0% (rest) 0% (Ischemic)
% of LV: 0% (stress) 0% (rest) 0% (Ischemic)
Ejection Fraction: 72%
ED volume, EDv Index: 91ml, 40 ml/m*m
ES Volume, ESx Index: 26ml, 11 ml/m*m
Cardiac Output: 4.9 l/min
Myocardial Mass: 139g
Summed WTHK score: 23
Summed WMOT score: 5
Global function: normal
LV Volume: normal
Regional function: normal
Stress/Rest LV volume ratio: 0.73, normal
Summary:
Stress was judged to be excellent. Stress had a hypertensive blood pressure response. Stress had normal ST response. Chest pain did not occur.
LV myocardial perfusion was normal. LV myocardial perfusion was consistent with 0 vessel disease. Global LV functions was normal. LV regional wall motion was normal.
RV perfusion was normal. RV volume was normal. RV regional wall motion was normal.
Scan significance was normal and indicates a very low risk for hard cardiac events. LV dilation was normal.