- Joined
- Jul 3, 2011
- Messages
- 5,480
- Location
- GDK & SBS
- Display Name
- Geezer
- Home Airfield
- GDK Greene County
Knowledge is useful and might be applied somewhere (I personally can’t think of any for reducing Sonic Boom except reducing damage claims from Supersonic Military Training Routes) but to think that Boom’s business case is anything but a flim flam exercise is believing the Star Trek’s Transporter Chamber is just a few years away.I'm taking their claimed results at face value, which I know is risky, but:
Do you think demonstrating that it is possible to tailor shock wave propagation such that the ground audible signature is significantly reduced is not useful? That demonstrating their design tools were capable of somewhat reasonably predicting that would happen is not useful?
Beating NASA and a few other agencies around the world to the punch may not exactly be useful but it is certainly interesting.
There's a lot more in the results than a supersonic bizjet.
Nauga,
and his tech mat



