Thanks sourdough, that helps.You can align with the runway headings or perpendicular taxiways. In Iowa once in the air, most any road is N/S or E/W. After that you have the setting & rising sun.
Isn’t a mag compass required?Also new to forums, learning that too. Looking at musketeer to fly, never flown a plane without mag compass over the panel. How do you make DG corrections?
It is required, TMK. Not much rental availability here, plane is at an local airport, owner looking for renters/lease.Isn’t a mag compass required?
It is required, TMK. Not much rental availability here, plane is at an local airport, owner looking for renters/lease.
Sent me some pics and nothing on around glareshield resemblingWresembling magbmag compass. Seeing in person this week
It probably does have one and pictures are all at wrong angle to see it. I was afraid that tech had completely left me behind on a compass. I have been back flying in a Archer for 6 months, after with CFI for about 20 h and BFR. Fundamentals came back pretty quick, it's the techy stuff that is the big learn. ThanksWelcome back, I was the same as you a couple years ago, hadn't flown in 25+ years. Have my instrument rating now and loving it. Averaging about 150 hours a year renting, would be more if I owned....
The airplane has to have a compass, probably on the panel.
Yeah. We still use a compass to set the DG. Glad you’re able to return to flying. It’s a real gift so enjoy it while it lasts.It probably does have one and pictures are all at wrong angle to see it. I was afraid that tech had completely left me behind on a compass. I have been back flying in a Archer for 6 months, after with CFI for about 20 h and BFR. Fundamentals came back pretty quick, it's the techy stuff that is the big learn. Thanks
It probably does have one and pictures are all at wrong angle to see it. I was afraid that tech had completely left me behind on a compass. I have been back flying in a Archer for 6 months, after with CFI for about 20 h and BFR. Fundamentals came back pretty quick, it's the techy stuff that is the big learn. Thanks
No. You don’t need the DG, but you still need the compass.So here’s a question... if you have a G5 with magnetometer, does that satisfy the requirement for a compass? I would assume so but never really considered it.
YesNo. You don’t need the DG, but you still need the compass.
So here’s a question... if you have a G5 with magnetometer, does that satisfy the requirement for a compass? I would assume so but never really considered it.
Yes
My understanding the compass is required, even for the G5 with a magnetometer. Even the new Cessna's with G1000's have a compass. Remember TOMATO FLAMES when flight training? The M is for magnetic.
Compass is on the required equipment list.You’re likely correct, but the FAR just refers to a “magnetic direction indicator”, which sounds like it could be a magnetometer driving a heading indicator.
No, it does not satisfy the requirement for a compass.Yes
My understanding the compass is required, even for the G5 with a magnetometer. Even the new Cessna's with G1000's have a compass. Remember TOMATO FLAMES when flight training? The M is for magnetic.
You’re likely correct, but the FAR just refers to a “magnetic direction indicator”, which sounds like it could be a magnetometer driving a heading indicator.
That, and the STC for the G5 with gmu11 does not including replacement of the compass.Compass is on the required equipment list.
Compass is required. A gate running a DG does not negate the required compass.You’re likely correct, but the FAR just refers to a “magnetic direction indicator”, which sounds like it could be a magnetometer driving a heading indicator.
The MEL for that aircraft may still require an actual compass, but the FARs should be satisfied by the magnetometer as a "magnetic direction indicator".
The 162 I used to fly only had a magnetometer, no whiskey compass....the FAR just refers to a “magnetic direction indicator”, which sounds like it could be a magnetometer driving a heading indicator.
The 162 I used to fly only had a magnetometer, no whiskey compass.
https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media...s-requirement-dropped-from-private-pilot-taskYou can't perform PPL checkrides in the 162 either since it does not have a compass.
Maybe, but it’d be a pretty big waste of time.You actually can do instrument training in the 162 as well, even though it is not certified for IMC.
Because using the gps in a 162 wouldn’t teach you much of anything useful about shooting an approach. JMOWhy do you say that? No actual? Almost every instrument pilot in Phoenix gets their cert with no actual !
Because using the gps in a 162 wouldn’t teach you much of anything useful about shooting an approach. JMO
You can’t train an approach in it at all. The SLSA Approved version Of software that you can train with can’t do an LPV, LNAV, ILS, LOC, or VOR approach.Not disagreeing at all Salty but would just like to understand this better. Is that something else about the 162? Or the fact that you can’t shoot an approach in IMC?