AOPA Petition to Board of Trustees

I don’t, but I am amazed why some people here do and why they believe they have the right to micro manage the AOPA. They had the opportunity to elect a board to oversee the Association. No one is irreplaceable and the members may discover they like the replacement. They may also replace the board.

And if you believe you need an explanation, the board thought the removal was in the interest of the Association. No further explanation is required.
AOPA is not a company, and we’re not employees. We are members, and the board is supposed to represent us. There can be no secrets - AOPA is not in competition with another company, there aren’t trade secrets to protect, none of that.
 
AOPA is not a company, and we’re not employees. We are members, and the board is supposed to represent us. There can be no secrets - AOPA is not in competition with another company, there aren’t trade secrets to protect, none of that.

And if AOPA refuses to listen to its members, then it’s claim to being the “voice of general aviation” is false, and it may soon be time to let our legislators know that they don’t speak for us. There are ways to skin ‘em besides an impractical proxy fight.
 
I think one of the problems Darren identified was that lack of clarity around what the purpose of AOPA actually is. "your freedom to fly" is pretty specific, yet there is a ton of stuff AOPA does that's not related to that mission. A good step would be for the Board to take a step back and redefine why they exist and sharpen their focus on that. A good example, the Foundation, why does it have so much money and what is that money for?
 
BTW, I received a solicitation letter from the AOPA PAC over the weekend. Their prepaid return envelope is going into the mail with a blistering letter in lieu of a donation. I recommend other members do the same.
 
Don't blame you, but I hope you did it with a letter telling them why.
I think they'll know why. I just let mine expire by turning off auto-renewal. It was due to expire soon after this whole brouhaha started.
But I do like your idea of using their prepaid return envelope to send them a sternly worded letter.
 
Sending a letter of explanation requires a minimum level of respect for and intent for the departing organization to improve.

I've done it for a few "firings" but certainly not all :)
 
Read the bylaws, there is no mechanism to replace the board. They have no accountability to the membership. No one is suggesting micromanaging anything. They abruptly fired a very popular executive with a clearly BS explanation then hired a PR firm to manage the blowback.
Oh, so you don’t vote for the board members?
 
Oh, so you don’t vote for the board members?
Only in the abstract. The nominating committee, which consists of existing board members, propose candidates. The only mechanism to vote is A; attend the annual meeting or B; assign a proxy to someone else, who attends the meeting. Read the minutes of the last member meeting, which by the way, lasted for 15 minutes. No ballot is sent to the membership to allow voting.
So yes, you can vote, just like you can vote in China, Cuba or Venezuela.

Here's the minutes of last year's Board meeting
www.aopa.org/-/media/Files/AOPA/Home/About-AOPA/2024AOPAMemberMeetingMinutes.pdf
 
Last edited:
Does anyone think those letters get read by anyone with ANY power?
 
Does anyone think those letters get read by anyone with ANY power?
Well, in my experience, a good secretary wields a lot of power. Especially when working for lazy bosses.

Do the trustees have secretaries?
 
Does anyone think those letters get read by anyone with ANY power?

I think a large number of letters from PO’d members, all describing similar reasons for dissatisfaction, gets noticed. And the lower tier folks reading them will tell their bosses that lots of members are upset over a certain issue, and this sometimes does bring about change.

Even a small percentage of members with a legitimate beef can do substantial damage to the organization’s reputation, and it gets worse when they start complaining to sponsors and advertisers. Leaders are aware of this and do consider it. Unless they’re complete idiots (a possibility, I admit), they will try to avoid upsetting thousands of members.
 
Does anyone think those letters get read by anyone with ANY power?

I wrote a note to the guys who run the club newsletters and program about a potential topic for a column and noted how, other than them, I just didn’t see much relevant to me coming out of AOPA and said I might not renew. They admitted there are problems internally that are being worked through and gave me a 20% off renewal code. I don’t expire until Nov so we’ll see.
 
Save AOPA... Lol

 
Save AOPA... Lol


This site claims, "The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) is the world's largest community of pilots and aircraft owners" and then estimates current membership by stating, "From 414,224 members in 2010 to around 200,000 paid members today—a 50% decline in influence."

If the 200K number is even remotely correct they are in trouble. Internet numbers for EAA is given as surpassing 300K in 2024 ...

FWIW :dunno:
 

There's a 'contact us' link at the bottom right. I wrote a scathing indictment of the AOPA, and if these people are some kind of link to mgmt at AOPA I hope they get flooded with AOPA complaints. It says 'sign up' but I didn't put a valid email in and the message was accepted.
 
If the current board won’t step down or conduct fair elections, we need a new organization.

AOPA can’t really be saved without changes in how the board is elected. I’m amazed it’s gotten this far with the board having essentially a blank check.
 
Interesting article. If their sourcees are accurate, I'm quite surprised only 2000 members quit and 6000 registered a complaint. I'm also surprised board members are quitting over those numbers.
Not surprising to me - (the numbers). The ratio of people who intend to do something vs actually do it, is pretty high. 6,000 complaints is a huge number against a 200k organization. Also, the decline in membership over time is another message things aren't working the way they should

Having said that, just "throwing the bums out" isn't a solution, though it is a needed step. There's a need to restructure the governance so there is more member input to the board selection/election. But more importantly, they need to do a full review of why they exist and compare that to what they are actually doing. At the moment, that feels like it's unclear and as a result, the org is not focused. That increases cost without a corresponding increase in member value. That sounds like a lot of what Darren P identified in his note to the Board.

It would be good for them to bring in an outsider (person or organization) to execute a full review and figure out what they are about and more importantly, not about, and develop a concrete plan to restructure AOPA to align with that. If they could stop doing some of the non-value adding BS, they could be much more effective at the member value adding things.
 
Interesting article. If their sourcees are accurate, I'm quite surprised only 2000 members quit and 6000 registered a complaint. I'm also surprised board members are quitting over those numbers.

That number, though a small percentage, is a canary in the coal mine. Many more (like possibly me) might just let their memberships expire without renewing, or may be waiting to see what happens at the annual meeting.
 
That number, though a small percentage, is a canary in the coal mine. Many more (like possibly me) might just let their memberships expire without renewing, or may be waiting to see what happens at the annual meeting.
Good point. That might be the number that "renounced" their membership. The interesting data would be year over year membership, although I doubt we'll ever see that. It would also have to be taken in light of the membership attrition they were already experiencing before this kerfuffle.
 
Last edited:
Good point. That might be the number that "renounced" their membership. The interesting data would be year over year membership, although I doubt we'll ever see that. It would also have to be taken in light of the membership attrition they were already experiencing before this kefuffle.

Unfortunately, we’ll likely never get good info. We don’t know the number of paying members at the present, as the AOPA apparently counts free memberships in its “300,000” number. I don’t know if it’s still the case, but they used to give a free introductory membership to student pilots. Many probably don’t renew, but there’s always a fresh crop, so the number might stay high but have constant churn.

There’s no transparency, and the AOPA isn’t behaving like a true membership organization. It has become a de facto subscriber-based services company, and it’s providing bloody few services.
 
Interesting article. If their sourcees are accurate, I'm quite surprised only 2000 members quit and 6000 registered a complaint. I'm also surprised board members are quitting over those numbers.
If a couple of board members are resigning, I'd bet it's because they don't want to be associated with the organization after the noise about the lack of member representation that came up after the president being fired. And I'd bet that those resigning were just on there to support what they thought was a good cause, that they weren't all that active, and they don't need the stress. Walking out farther onto a limb with absolutely know knowledge to back me up, the ones left might not have any incentive or desire to leave. But there's an 85% chance I'm completely wrong, because I've made all this up out of thin air...including that percentage
 
Interesting article. If their sourcees are accurate, I'm quite surprised only 2000 members quit and 6000 registered a complaint. I'm also surprised board members are quitting over those numbers.
I don't think that 2,000 number is done rising. How many people are still a member but won't be when it's time to renew?
 

There's a 'contact us' link at the bottom right. I wrote a scathing indictment of the AOPA, and if these people are some kind of link to mgmt at AOPA I hope they get flooded with AOPA complaints. It says 'sign up' but I didn't put a valid email in and the message was accepted.
"SaveAOPA.org is not affiliated with AOPA. AOPA® is a registered trademark of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association. This is an independent advocacy website."
 
I opted to not auto-renew after the NRA debacle came to light. I’m a Life Member there, so my dues were paid in full and I couldn’t cancel. After that, I decided that I wouldn’t do anything but an annual membership in any organization, just in case something like that happens elsewhere. Turned out to be a prescient move. Unless AOPA takes some major action and changes course, I won’t be renewing.
 
I opted to not auto-renew after the NRA debacle came to light. I’m a Life Member there, so my dues were paid in full and I couldn’t cancel.
There’s nothing that prevents you from canceling a life membership. It might even get more notice than canceling an annual membership.

I happen to know one guy who cancelled a life membership. His departure from the organization was visually entertaining as well. The powers that be worked pretty hard to resolve the differences.
 
There’s nothing that prevents you from canceling a life membership. It might even get more notice than canceling an annual membership.

I happen to know one guy who cancelled a life membership. His departure from the organization was visually entertaining as well. The powers that be worked pretty hard to resolve the differences.
I would do that with the NRA but I depend on them for my classification card for small bore silhouette matches even though they've gotten down to one person that does all silhouette. Not for this thread but it's another organization that has lost touch with its members and mission.
 
I would do that with the NRA but I depend on them for my classification card for small bore silhouette matches even though they've gotten down to one person that does all silhouette. Not for this thread but it's another organization that has lost touch with its members and mission.

Getting better, slowly, as we’ve replaced much of the board now.
 
But there's an 85% chance I'm completely wrong, because I've made all this up out of thin air...including that percentage
43.7% of the time, 71.2% of all percentages are made up on the spot, and are only 50% correct.
 
I would do that with the NRA but I depend on them for my classification card for small bore silhouette matches even though they've gotten down to one person that does all silhouette. Not for this thread but it's another organization that has lost touch with its members and mission.
Not to get off track, but recently some reformers were able to get on the board over there and have started making some needed changes. Staying is the only real option in that regard as places to shoot, especially outdoors, are very limited in my area. I also figure if they can start turning things around over at NRA, the same can be done at AOPA. I've got 6 months left on my membership and I plan making any effort possible to try and at least get the process of fixing it started. It took years for the organization to get to this point and may take as long to get it back to a place where it's at least acceptable to us as pilots.
 
Not to get off track, ...

just a note. There are some states with organizations that can also help if you think the NRA isn't getting the job done for you. But, maybe no sucg organizations are in your state.
 
Back
Top