OK, this from the guy who just had a mid-life change of career into something he really loved. Face it - no one alive today goes out into the wild with a club or spear to eat to survive, so he can procreate. That was the ultimate direct regenerative force of labor. Today, and for a few thousand of years we've variegated our own individual labor to trade for food, shelter, clothing, etc.
If one doesn't like the type or amount of labor they do, in almost all civilized societies, there is a minimalist safety net that will allow a human to survive and more with almost zero labor input into the society. We have developed the safety net to a fine art, and spend significant capital expense to see that almost every belly is full and all have a roof over their head, and a decent winter coat and some kind of shoes.
Sure, slavery exists today in tiny pockets of out of the way backwater places. We BKed the Soviet system, and even there a person is relatively free to choose a career or simply a job to earn their daily bread. I keep thinking, 'first world problems'. We're too fat, we're too lazy, we're too bored, we're too tired.
Enter - AI. What few people out there that are working to survive, they are going to be in the same damn bucket next year they are in today. AI isn't going to take away drudgery. It might make a small, even modest dent in drudgery, but it'll still be around, and if the people who have to work don't like it, change, or quit whining.