What does "more than 4-6" mean? Will this program save "up to 15% or more" on my car insurance? Is it available if I have "up to $10,000 or more" in credit card debt? Why did the FAA hire a writer whose last job was writing ads for late-night broadcast on unpopular satellite radio channels?
Had the balloon guy been required to hold a medical and submit to NDR checks, the FAA would have known about the multiple DUIs and pulled his medical certificate. It would be pretty easy surveillance at that point to shut him down if he was operating without a medical.
The way I read it was Class II medicals are required for all. There was some other stuff that was voluntary depending on how 'shiny' a rating you wanted
Of course not, but other operators who do participate in the program now have a point of differentiation. If consumers perceive these operators as being higher quality, then it will exert pressure on others to take part. It's a way for industry to influence quality without letting them block competition. This is exactly how it works in my industry.
There were no changes to the regs, hence no NPRM. If you wanted to provide input on the industry standard, there was an opportunity to comment.
Ok, so it becomes an industry standard, above the requirements of the FARs. That works, but not enforceable?
Regulations are enforceable. Industry standards are only enforceable if there’s a regulation requiring adherence to the standard. In this case there is not—it is a voluntary standard.
At least with restaurants the food safety ratings are more obvious, like "A" is clearly better than "B" and so forth.. but I also doubt most consumers know what it actually requires to get an "A" rating or what you failed for a "B" etc
Why would the consumer's insurance company know or care?
The balloon guy was required to not be high. He was high. What makes you think that requiring to have a medical would mean that he actually would have a medical? And 100% of pilots with unreported DUIs get their medicals pulled? Not likely. And we all know that no one ever gets in a 121 cockpit intoxicated.....
Six seater gliders, now there's a hole begging to get filled in GA
I think they're just haunted by bad marketing. These stereotypes are like herpes. That's s---t's forever
View attachment 57176
I doubt this was a priority for Senator Cruz. More likely since he's from Houston, someone asked him to introduce this. I could be wrong, but if this is important to him, the FAA's new rules are unlikely to be sufficient.
And you base your doubt on this being a priority for Senator Cruz based on what? Regardless, not much in the way of FAA resources were expelled; this is a BFA initiative and the were no new rules enacted by the FAA.
The balloon operator’s insurance. Sure, the operator might be uninsured, but it’s yet another incentive for an operator to voluntarily adhere to an industry standard.
