valittu
Pre-takeoff checklist
Google's "Planetary Ventures" is setting up shop in Hangar one, of all places. Truly, nothing is sacred.
Google's "Planetary Ventures" is setting up shop in Hangar one, of all places. Truly, nothing is sacred.
Nothing is sacred? What are you talking about?
Google has had a close relationship with its neighbor for many years. You do know where Google is physically located, right?
If you didn't donate to the Save Hangar One fund, you have N O T H I N G to say about it. Either Google gets it or it stays the giant birds nest the Navy left it, or it gets torn down. Personally, I don't like either of the alternatives.
Just what exactly do you want done with Hangar One? It hasn't had any sensible use since the Navy left 20 years ago, and arguably since World War II.
Google won't be happy until they have their ads on the insides of our eyelids.
-Rich
Make it into condos, perhaps? Or maybe a prison?
It's hard to come up with a practical use for a building of that design. I have no idea what Google plans to do with it; and to tell you the truth, I really don't want to give it much thought. But it wouldn't shock me if they wanted to build an airship so they can sell ads in the sky, as well as everywhere else. Google won't be happy until they have their ads on the insides of our eyelids.
-Rich
Google has promised rather explicitly NOT to alter the outside of Hangar One.
Believe me, you're not the first person to think a big Google logo on the side facing 101 might be tempting for them.
If Google was as interested as displaying their logo and ads everywhere they could, as some here suggest, then please explain why google.com is 85% white space.
Perhaps facts do not quite align with your reality?
Google search is the ultimate bait-and-switch...no ads on the "home" search page, 1/3rd to 1/2 ads after that...
Clearly identified as ads. Why would anyone expect Google NOT be allowed to make money?
Do you rail against all ads or just Google ads?
Nothing is sacred? What are you talking about?
Google has had a close relationship with its neighbor for many years. You do know where Google is physically located, right?
If you didn't donate to the Save Hangar One fund, you have N O T H I N G to say about it. Either Google gets it or it stays the giant birds nest the Navy left it, or it gets torn down. Personally, I don't like either of the alternatives.
Just what exactly do you want done with Hangar One? It hasn't had any sensible use since the Navy left 20 years ago, and arguably since World War II.
If Google was as interested as displaying their logo and ads everywhere they could, as some here suggest, then please explain why google.com is 85% white space.
Perhaps facts do not quite align with your reality?
If Google was as interested as displaying their logo and ads everywhere they could, as some here suggest, then please explain why google.com is 85% white space.
Perhaps facts do not quite align with your reality?