WSD-88D Base velocity image

Richard

Richard

Final Approach
Joined
Feb 27, 2005
Messages
9,076
Location
West Coast Resistance
Display Name
Ack...city life
See the attached.

Am I correct in saying the velocity increases due to landform? Or is that a "phantom" due to type of radar? One reason I suspect the latter is because it's only in the NW quadrant that velocity increase is noted.
 

Attachments

  • NWS LAX loop.gif
    NWS LAX loop.gif
    292.4 KB · Views: 11
  • NWS SFO loop.gif
    NWS SFO loop.gif
    319.4 KB · Views: 8
Last edited:
Richard said:
See the attached.

Am I correct in saying the velocity increases due to landform? Or is that a "phantom" due to type of radar? One reason I suspect the latter is because it's only in the NW quadrant that velocity increase is noted.
Click to expand...

I think it's more likely that what you see there is a wind direction shift not a velocity increase but I'm not certain of that. Keep in mind that the indicated velocity only represents the vector towards or from the antenna site.
 
lancefisher said:
I think it's more likely that what you see there is a wind direction shift not a velocity increase but I'm not certain of that. Keep in mind that the indicated velocity only represents the vector towards or from the antenna site.
Click to expand...

CORRECTION: It is WSR-88D. It's technical name is WSR-88D, which stands for Weather Surveillance Radar, 1988, Doppler.
 
lancefisher said:
I think it's more likely that what you see there is a wind direction shift not a velocity increase but I'm not certain of that. Keep in mind that the indicated velocity only represents the vector towards or from the antenna site.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I was confused by thinking of speed rather than direction relative to the antenna. Doppler, Doppler, Doppler...Doh!

Still, I don't understand why wind direction would be more important than speed, or at least direction and speed. The antenna is at a low elevation angle so it's not looking for convection or tornadic cells.

WSRs are not used to compile station observations, right?
 
Last edited:
Richard said:
Yeah, I was confused by thinking of speed rather than direction relative to the antenna. Doppler, Doppler, Doppler...Doh!

Still, I don't understand why wind direction would be more important than speed, or at least direction and speed. The antenna is at a low elevation angle so it's not looking for convection or tornadic cells.

WSRs are not used to compile station observations, right?
Click to expand...

Nope. AFaIK they're mostly used to locate and track TRW and associated severe weather. The original intended purpose of the doppler capability was to help identify rotation within cells.
 
My understanding is the WSR-88D was to provide information on winds to aid aircraft routing information.

My question WRT radar being used to compile (or augment) station observations was I was speculating that this would explain why wind velocity (relative to the antenna) is given.
 
Richard said:
Yeah, I was confused by thinking of speed rather than direction relative to the antenna. Doppler, Doppler, Doppler...Doh!

Still, I don't understand why wind direction would be more important than speed, or at least direction and speed. The antenna is at a low elevation angle so it's not looking for convection or tornadic cells.

WSRs are not used to compile station observations, right?
Click to expand...

The antenna is at an elevation of 0.5 degrees at the beginning of a base reflectivity scan but then tilts upward for each successive scan for composite reflectivity. Chapter 4 in Aviation Weather Services (AS 00-45F) is worth reading.

Bob Gardner
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top