poadeleted3
Pattern Altitude
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2005
- Messages
- 2,055
I'm just dreaming again, not buying anytime soon. My wife decided we wanted a second car more, so the dream is still on hold.
http://www.aso.com/aircraft/88944
In the meantime, a Beech A23-19 like this would do well for us I think, especially for $26K. Nice, big, roomy, comfortable planes, fun to fly from what I'm told. They certainly aren't fast, but there are very few places we need to be in a hurry to be honest. They aren't short field machines with a load, but I've got plenty of runway available to me, and can make that compromise. Speaking of load, that's the weakest point of this plane for me, but it's still doable. 712 pounds is enough to carry me, Cathy, Sean, a weekend bag the way we pack, and still have 34 gallons of fuel. 34 gallons is enough behind an O-320 for at least 2.5 hrs plus a good VFR reserve.
The plane has one decent comm radio and one decent nav, and the Genav nav/comm may or may not be worth keeping in the plane. I think I would probably dump the boat anchor ADF and scrounge the extra couple pounds of useful. Cosmetically, the plane is adequate. I could see going this route and dealing with the lack of useful load. Four (three) seats beats the two in a 150/152 for us, and they cost about the same.
http://www.aso.com/aircraft/88944
In the meantime, a Beech A23-19 like this would do well for us I think, especially for $26K. Nice, big, roomy, comfortable planes, fun to fly from what I'm told. They certainly aren't fast, but there are very few places we need to be in a hurry to be honest. They aren't short field machines with a load, but I've got plenty of runway available to me, and can make that compromise. Speaking of load, that's the weakest point of this plane for me, but it's still doable. 712 pounds is enough to carry me, Cathy, Sean, a weekend bag the way we pack, and still have 34 gallons of fuel. 34 gallons is enough behind an O-320 for at least 2.5 hrs plus a good VFR reserve.
The plane has one decent comm radio and one decent nav, and the Genav nav/comm may or may not be worth keeping in the plane. I think I would probably dump the boat anchor ADF and scrounge the extra couple pounds of useful. Cosmetically, the plane is adequate. I could see going this route and dealing with the lack of useful load. Four (three) seats beats the two in a 150/152 for us, and they cost about the same.