Why was "Election Process" Moved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KennyFlys
  • Start date Start date
K

KennyFlys

Guest
It seemed like a reasonable discussion. Points were shared without a lean toward party ties or being political in nature. I saw a reasoned discussion about a constitutional issue where some understood and some did not. It was a chance to learn about a process most do not understand. Disagreements were opined but in good taste and without any attack on ideas or individuals.

Sorry, but that is an action I very much disagree with. It was a WRONG action on the part of the person making the change. There was not so much as even a word in the thread before it was moved.

Has it come to the point we can't have a reasonable discussion such as this without someone becoming offended?

A special thanks to Spike for his great explanations for what did take place... even if low wing airplanes are inferior to high wings. :)
 
oh great it went to the spin zone? what a great way to ruin a thread
 
Someone reported it as a Bad Post, and a moderator responding to that report moved it. Currently under MC review. Please be patient.
 
jsut my $.02, I did not think it 'political' but it was a good civics discussion. I also did not perceive any arguments, just a back and forth of viewpoints. I know there are some people on this board that do have a zero tolerance of anything that smells political and really only want aviation related content. We must strive for a balance of that viewpoint as well as the other side where we also talk of other issues. I agree that non-aviation politics does not belong outside of the SZ.
 
I made a few posts in that thread before I realized that it wasn't in SZ. Since I hit the "New Posts" button to browse posts I sometimes don't notice what forum they are in. Still I think it was a great discussion and I can't see how it would've offended anyone.
 
smigaldi said:
Can I start a thread, 'Why was it moved back' now? ;)
Click to expand...
You can, but it could very well lead to a later thread, 'Why was smigaldi banned for life?'











;)














(I'm JUST KIDDING!!!)
 
It was Mari's fault. You know how much trouble women can cause!










037.gif
:)
 
Ron Levy said:
You are quite welcome.
Click to expand...

Now it's an age discrimination issue. What happened to the original thread? Some of us take longer than others to conjure up a response, and no chance of remembering what it was if we can't read all the posts.
 
smigaldi said:
What? I really do not understand what you mean at all. :dunno: It is back in hangar talk so you can see it whenever you want without having to go to SZ.
Click to expand...

HE'S JOKING SCOTT!!! Catch up here, willya???!!!!!:D
 
KennyFlys said:
It seemed like a reasonable discussion. Points were shared without a lean toward party ties or being political in nature. I saw a reasoned discussion about a constitutional issue where some understood and some did not. It was a chance to learn about a process most do not understand. Disagreements were opined but in good taste and without any attack on ideas or individuals.

Sorry, but that is an action I very much disagree with. It was a WRONG action on the part of the person making the change. There was not so much as even a word in the thread before it was moved.

Has it come to the point we can't have a reasonable discussion such as this without someone becoming offended?

A special thanks to Spike for his great explanations for what did take place... even if low wing airplanes are inferior to high wings. :)
Click to expand...


It was done to make you suffer more, Kenny!!!!:raspberry::raspberry::raspberry::raspberry:




:D:D:D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top