- Joined
- Dec 29, 2015
- Messages
- 9,306
- Display Name
Display name:
Aztec Flyer
I don't see them selling too many either. They are in Seneca and Baron territory and those seem like much more airplane for the money. Let's face it, someone who can afford a 1M airplane isn't going to scoff at the gas it eats. The Twin Star makes a much more appealing argument as its more closely priced with the Seneca. Let's be honest, the only people buying new twins are flight schools and they do care about operating cost. The price difference between a Seneca and the Twin star will more than pay for it's self after 1000 hours.
I'm really surprised there aren't more Tecnam's at flight schools as twin trainers.
Diamond sells about as many DA42s each year as Barons and Senecas combined (roughly 50 out of 100 total for the 3 models recent stats).
The DA62 doesn't seem a training airplane at all, and the USA commercial market may be a tough one. Avgas is readily available in the USA and Canada, and it would seem the DA62 might have more success in commercial markets overseas where avgas is very expensive and/or difficult to impossible to find.
One of our local flight training colleges is using Tecnam twins in their program. Seems a modern version of an Apache with those little engines.
Our flying club sold the two single engine DA20-C1s it used to have. They both proved to be seriously maintenance prone with a lot of time offline in the shop. They seem just a bit too fragile and brittle to put up with the rigours of a student training and rental environment. They were replaced with two refurbished 152s and a used 172, all of which combined are measurably less expensive to keep flying than the DA20s.