Forget CERN- Brookhaven on Long Island has upgraded their equipment- the Relativistic Heavy Ion collider is the second highest energy collider now and was the most "powerful" until 2008 or 2010. I think they can do experiments that CERN can't, such as collisions of spin-polarized particles.Shoot, they've been running on a severely shorted budget since before the LHC at CERN was even complete. With the LHC now functioning though, Tevatron is a high cost of operations for a lower potential yield than performing the experiment in the LHC. They never did achieve many of the results they were hoping for in the time that Fermilab did operate it and now there is better equipment for running the experiments.
Green energy? Solyndra?Forget CERN- Brookhaven on Long Island has upgraded their equipment- the Relativistic Heavy Ion collider is the second highest energy collider now and was the most "powerful" until 2008 or 2010. I think they can do experiments that CERN can't, such as collisions of spin-polarized particles.
The money has simply been placed elsewhere.
Nope. Brookhaven National Lab, Stanford, and yes, CERN. The Tevatron didn't have anything really unique that the other labs didn't already have AFAIK.Green energy? Solyndra?
(sorry if this response belongs in the SZ, couldn't resist)
Forget CERN- Brookhaven on Long Island has upgraded their equipment- the Relativistic Heavy Ion collider is the second highest energy collider now and was the most "powerful" until 2008 or 2010. I think they can do experiments that CERN can't, such as collisions of spin-polarized particles.
The money has simply been placed elsewhere.
Is there any practical return on this investment?
This seems like a great place to get edumacated, so I will jump in here...
Can anyone explain, in layman's terms, what we, as taxpayers, get out of these atom smashers? Is there any practical return on this investment?
Knowledge of the universe. We've gotten an understanding of nuclear processes which led to nuclear power from this work.This seems like a great place to get edumacated, so I will jump in here...
Can anyone explain, in layman's terms, what we, as taxpayers, get out of these atom smashers? Is there any practical return on this investment?
If the work pans out. Some people that were involved in that experiment didn't want to be listed as authors because they thought there were problems with the experiment. Go look it up in the other thread.Yes, we found that things can depart and re-enter Space Time the other day.
???When we travel throughout the cosmos point to point instantly by transitioning through the chaos of eternity, it will be because of these atom smashers.
Someone's been reading Dan Brown.When we understand how to harness the energy from a full conversion reaction (anti-matter & matter coming together), it will be because of these atom smashers. There are a hundred more possibilities I can give you. These are the machines that allow us to get a glimpse into the nature of the universe.
And just as importantly, what is the return on investment in dumping that money into whatever nonsense organization it will go to now?

Theoretical Physicists typically don't belong to nonsense organizations
Exactly. The question is about the justification of taking the money away from science and putting it into whatever it goes into next. Maybe it stays in physics. Maybe it will go to line some greedy persons pockets or into some organization that doesn't really do anything productive at all.
Trans Dimensional Church of Henning. Send your contributions to Fort Lauderdale, FL![]()
I think we get pretty much the same thing as what we did out the space program and our billions if not trillions spent there.Can anyone explain, in layman's terms, what we, as taxpayers, get out of these atom smashers? Is there any practical return on this investment?