David Moeslein
Pre-Flight
For those who may be following this (out of interest, disgust, hate, apathy, sympathy) whatever . . .
. . . here is a copy of the letter that my Congressman received from the FAA's Chief Counsel.
A very typical response, but certainly nothing in there in disagreement with anything that happened or anything that I believe. I think, at this point, it was way too late to get "elected officials" involved; once it gets into the court(s), that's where it is.
I was hoping that, if nothing else, the Congressman could be effective in getting the suspension considered to have been served but, even there, FAA precedent is that the suspension is not served until the certificate has been surrendered.
ONE concerning thing in the FAA's response appears on page 2 of the letter - 3rd paragraph: "Mr. Moeslein, also through the same attorney, also rejected several FAA attempts to settle this matter with him before the FAA issued the order of suspension." I do not ever recall having "several FAA attempts to settle this matter" so, let's assume the FAA's records are correct, could my attorney have simply blown them off as he (with me along for the ride) charged along with a weak defense of my not being the PIC? I think I will respond to the FAA and ask for the notes/record on this because IF that is the case, maybe a do have a case of attorney misrepresentation ---- then again, how much time and money would that take with no 100% guarantee of success? Right now, interestingly on the anniversary of September 11, I'm 45 days into the 90-day suspension. No aviation jobs on the horizon even if I had a pristine certificate and the good gig that I had went away because of the "pending violation" so it wouldn't have been an option either.
This has been a painful lesson and, dragged out by the attorney, will be one with a 10-year lifespan! The attorney will argue that he preserved my certificate and delayed the suspension for 5 years with legal maneuvering. The legal maneuvering I do not mind, that is all part of the game --- but, the proper defense would have been the way to handle it and it probably would have all been long resolved by now --- maybe without any penalty whatsoever...but I won;t go back over what I have said before.
Just posting this as an "update" . . .
. . . here is a copy of the letter that my Congressman received from the FAA's Chief Counsel.
A very typical response, but certainly nothing in there in disagreement with anything that happened or anything that I believe. I think, at this point, it was way too late to get "elected officials" involved; once it gets into the court(s), that's where it is.
I was hoping that, if nothing else, the Congressman could be effective in getting the suspension considered to have been served but, even there, FAA precedent is that the suspension is not served until the certificate has been surrendered.
ONE concerning thing in the FAA's response appears on page 2 of the letter - 3rd paragraph: "Mr. Moeslein, also through the same attorney, also rejected several FAA attempts to settle this matter with him before the FAA issued the order of suspension." I do not ever recall having "several FAA attempts to settle this matter" so, let's assume the FAA's records are correct, could my attorney have simply blown them off as he (with me along for the ride) charged along with a weak defense of my not being the PIC? I think I will respond to the FAA and ask for the notes/record on this because IF that is the case, maybe a do have a case of attorney misrepresentation ---- then again, how much time and money would that take with no 100% guarantee of success? Right now, interestingly on the anniversary of September 11, I'm 45 days into the 90-day suspension. No aviation jobs on the horizon even if I had a pristine certificate and the good gig that I had went away because of the "pending violation" so it wouldn't have been an option either.
This has been a painful lesson and, dragged out by the attorney, will be one with a 10-year lifespan! The attorney will argue that he preserved my certificate and delayed the suspension for 5 years with legal maneuvering. The legal maneuvering I do not mind, that is all part of the game --- but, the proper defense would have been the way to handle it and it probably would have all been long resolved by now --- maybe without any penalty whatsoever...but I won;t go back over what I have said before.
Just posting this as an "update" . . .