Wasn't as simple as that. Landed at NRT around the same time. Probably just before the aircraft concerned.
Winds observed at 1000 ft agl were 240/58-72 kts, dropping down to 230/48 kts steady at 500 ft. And then there was a +/- 15 kts WS reported. On my observation it was more like +/- 20 kts windshear!
And the turbulence was huge. Moderate to moderate/severe turbulence REPORTED by 4 airplane before me from 500 ft to touchdown. I observed Moderate/Severe all the way down from 500 ft to touchdown.
And BTW the winds reported on ground were 220 to 250 at 28 gusting 44 kts. That's a direct crosswind for the runway in use-16R.
And the winds were spot on!
Airport should have been temporarily closed.
I saw a 727 come in like that at the Wings of Man (Eastern) years ago. It was ferried in with large beams bridging the wrinkle. Something like 14 stringers broken. They jacked it, removed the windows and supported the fuselage with huge maybe 8x8 timber. Then just stripped off a band of metal across the crown and reskinned it.
That is some pretty tough nose gear though.
Alright, he did pretty good given the conditions. That's the way a lot of box rides go for those conditions I bet lol; could have done a skosh better but the plane toughed it out pretty dang well considering. Didn't turn into a flaming barbeque so it's all good. What's your guess, scrap/salvage or repair?
With so many good planes in storage, I bet they scrap it...
-Skip
My guess as well. Aren't a lot of the engines leased separate from the airframes anyway?
but I think so. -SkipI'm guessing the stewardess "forgot the coffee!!!"
(Good Will Hunting reference)
"Landed at NRT around the same time. Probably just before the aircraft concerned.
Winds observed at 1000 ft agl were 240/58-72 kts, dropping down to 230/48 kts steady at 500 ft. And then there was a +/- 15 kts WS reported. On my observation it was more like +/- 20 kts windshear!
And the turbulence was huge. Moderate to moderate/severe turbulence REPORTED by 4 airplane before me from 500 ft to touchdown. I observed Moderate/Severe all the way down from 500 ft to touchdown.
And BTW the winds reported on ground were 220 to 250 at 28 gusting 44 kts".
I don't buy the wind shear theory either. I am thinking that someone didn't turn off their electronic devices.
That was my thought also on seeing the buckling in the fuselage.
That was a hard landing, but they didn't slam the nose down on the 380 like they were trapping on a carrier.I thought the A380 landed Osh harder than that.
Is it economically viable anymore? I guess it would depend on total age and where it is in its maintenance cycles.
From pprune:
Airport should have been temporarily closed.