T-38 crash at CAFB

Ow. As you said, Steve, :(.

I am pleased that the AF waits 24 hours after the notification of the family before releasing their names, however.

I was surprised that they still appear to use T-6 Texans in active training!

And I was disappointed that the station couldn't spell "cockpit." Maybe they were worried that web filters would grab onto a sub-word?
 
well, the t-6 texan IIs are not the wwii version...

http://www.t6driver.com/

t6_Texan2.jpg
 
Last edited:
God bless those two pilots.

There isn't a more beautiful aircraft flying, IMHO (except for whatever aircraft I happen to be flying at the time :yes: ). Unfortunately, its small cockpit also kept me out of the USAF (1/4" too tall sitting height according to the husky female airman at Offutt AFB Hospital, circa 1982).

This summer at AirVenture I was speaking to one of the USAF's T-38 pilots, and we were discussing the fast approach speed (155kts I believe.) He said their minimum runway distance for landing is 8,000, if I recall, but said that they prefer 12,000 ft runways. Of course, I couldn't help but say "Sure, don't we all!" I'm sure he thought I was an idiot, but it was a shining moment nonetheless. :)
 
I love the T-38. Actually like the F-5 a little better, but they are essentially similar.

The T-38 needs as little as 2,300 feet of runway to take off
Click to expand...

Is this true? That sounds pretty short to me, but then again I drive a Grumman and like to have at least that much, although I have done shorter at sea level.
 
Last edited:
Anthony said:
Is this true? That sounds pretty short to me, but then again I drive a Grumman and like to have at least that much, although I have done shorter at sea level.
Click to expand...

Taking off is one thing, with all that power... landing, with that high-loaded wing and slippery airframe, is another. It must be challenging to do it right, even with a long runway.

Very sorry to hear about these guys, especially as it seems they were nearly out of the woods, as far as the landing went, when it happened. :confused:
 
Yes, it's always a sad thing to lose a fellow pilot. What bothers me about this accident in particular is I may have met these guys or gals working a static display at a recent airshow/fly-in. :(

rottydaddy said:
Taking off is one thing, with all that power... landing, with that high-loaded wing and slippery airframe, is another. It must be challenging to do it right, even with a long runway.

Very sorry to hear about these guys, especially as it seems they were nearly out of the woods, as far as the landing went, when it happened. :confused:
Click to expand...
 
rottydaddy said:
Taking off is one thing, with all that power... landing, with that high-loaded wing and slippery airframe, is another. It must be challenging to do it right, even with a long runway.
:confused:
Click to expand...

No Flap landings were VERY sporty!! The back seater could only see the runway edge cause of the high nose angle. It's not a very forgiving airplane but it is a blast to fly.

Sad to hear about the student and IP. My thoughts go out to their families. Never saw anything about it in the ATL news though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top