Aztec Driver
Line Up and Wait
So, In the continuing saga of attempting to justify the expenses of my airplane, I am wondering how good starting up a non equity club for a few members would be.
The aircraft would certainly need to be owned by a corporation and have appropriate insurance to cover a club system.
The club I was a member of previously was a very bad example of how to run a club, in my opinion. The owner was a crook and attempted to "extort" money from members for shortages that had nothing to do with either the aircraft or the club.
How are these usually arranged?
These were my thoughts on the arrangement.
1. Each member would pay a membership fee, refundable when they decide to leave.
2. Each member would pay a share of the fixed costs.
3. Each member would pay for the hourly operating costs for the aircraft.
4. Each member would leave the aircraft fuel full at the end of each flight.
I assume the fixed costs should include hangar, insurance, approximate annual cost, and gps updates. Do you add in to this the normal expected yearly maintenance that would be performed with the expected amount of use time, or do you add this into the hourly cost? When my partner and I were splitting costs, we split the hangar, insurance and GPS, and we paid an hourly amount that would take care of the maintenance (including annual) based on what we figure would be the total time in the aircraft for the year. If we didn't fly much or there was more maintenance than expected, it sometimes was not enough to cover it. The engine and avionics reserves then took a hit. That made the person who flew the most, pay the most, which was a bit more fair.
The hourly costs should include expected maintenance, engine reserves and avionics reserves. If the annual and normal expected maintenance is included in the fixed costs, the hourly rate could be considerably lower, especially if it is a dry rate.
How does one deal with maintenance over and above the normal? Since the members, with the exception of myself, would all be non owners, one can't expect them to pony up unexpected costs, like prop failure, or some other unforeseen problem. How does an owner deal with the extra possibility of unforeseen problems that come along with the extra usage of the aircraft?
Some of the problems can be mitigated by carefully selecting pilots from a known pool, or at least ones highly recommended by a trusted source.
Is this a reasonable way to get the aircraft used regularly, and maybe cut some of the costs to everyone? When I was a member of the club, at least at first, it seemed a great way to fly for a lower cost. I had some money invested in the club, the hourly rate was lower than I could rent a lesser aircraft for, and the availability was terrific. Unfortunately, getting the money back from the club after he decided to try to bill us for incidents that happened before we were even members required us to resort to legal means.
The aircraft would certainly need to be owned by a corporation and have appropriate insurance to cover a club system.
The club I was a member of previously was a very bad example of how to run a club, in my opinion. The owner was a crook and attempted to "extort" money from members for shortages that had nothing to do with either the aircraft or the club.
How are these usually arranged?
These were my thoughts on the arrangement.
1. Each member would pay a membership fee, refundable when they decide to leave.
2. Each member would pay a share of the fixed costs.
3. Each member would pay for the hourly operating costs for the aircraft.
4. Each member would leave the aircraft fuel full at the end of each flight.
I assume the fixed costs should include hangar, insurance, approximate annual cost, and gps updates. Do you add in to this the normal expected yearly maintenance that would be performed with the expected amount of use time, or do you add this into the hourly cost? When my partner and I were splitting costs, we split the hangar, insurance and GPS, and we paid an hourly amount that would take care of the maintenance (including annual) based on what we figure would be the total time in the aircraft for the year. If we didn't fly much or there was more maintenance than expected, it sometimes was not enough to cover it. The engine and avionics reserves then took a hit. That made the person who flew the most, pay the most, which was a bit more fair.
The hourly costs should include expected maintenance, engine reserves and avionics reserves. If the annual and normal expected maintenance is included in the fixed costs, the hourly rate could be considerably lower, especially if it is a dry rate.
How does one deal with maintenance over and above the normal? Since the members, with the exception of myself, would all be non owners, one can't expect them to pony up unexpected costs, like prop failure, or some other unforeseen problem. How does an owner deal with the extra possibility of unforeseen problems that come along with the extra usage of the aircraft?
Some of the problems can be mitigated by carefully selecting pilots from a known pool, or at least ones highly recommended by a trusted source.
Is this a reasonable way to get the aircraft used regularly, and maybe cut some of the costs to everyone? When I was a member of the club, at least at first, it seemed a great way to fly for a lower cost. I had some money invested in the club, the hourly rate was lower than I could rent a lesser aircraft for, and the availability was terrific. Unfortunately, getting the money back from the club after he decided to try to bill us for incidents that happened before we were even members required us to resort to legal means.