R-6413. The 'new' old Area-51. Dozens of years inactive, but still an R space.

docmirror

Touchdown! Greaser!
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
12,008
Display Name

Display name:
Cowboy - yeehah!
About 20 years ago, I used to make a sometimes flight between Co Springs, and out west. I always charted it, and often wondered about R-6413, just south of Green River UT.

A dozen years ago, when I lived in Denver and would go boating at lake Powell, I actually got off the highway once, and trundled down a few goat tracks, and came to an imposing fence due south of Green River. I haven't been back since.

Recently, I've gained interest in the location again and did some digging. So far, I have found only a few clues to the R space, and it's original identity, but a lot of it still shrouded in mystery.

An old tin-hat guy has this to say:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/891398/posts

And there is some backing by this:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread11384/pg1

Which linked a Pop Mechanics story that is no longer avail, prolly just due to age, and nothing nefarious. A debunker of the article had this to say:

http://www.ufomind.com/area51/list/1997/may/a17-001.shtml

But he apparently didn't find these rather short 'runways' or whatever they are in the location under the R space:

https://www.google.com/maps/place/3...936003,22649m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0x0

It's been so long that I was down there, I can't recall if that's the area where the big chain link fence was, but it certainly could be. The road is rather tongue in cheek named 'new Area 51 rd' as well as the general BLM325 rd.

Also of interest to note, is the orientation of the short runways to the delineation of the R space above it. Hmmmmm, does sort of look like some kind of almost vertical launch, or very high Q environment where the craft would be taken almost straight up, coinciding with the R space going from sfc to UNL.

AOPA had this to say about it 7 years back:

http://www.aopa.org/News-and-Video/...ary-should-release-unused-restricted-airspace

Nothing since. At the very least, I strongly agree with AOPA that these R spaces that haven't been used for decades need to be returned to the NAS public, and decommissioned officially. There are several around NM and of course in SoCal which has grown by leaps and bounds in the past 20 years to no benefit that I can see. Before you try the public shaming via 'well, they need to practice you know', I do know, and the military doesn't need even 1/10 of what they have restricted and in MOA airspace. Much of it could be reduced, and some of it can be released like this deal.

Anyone have any other thoughts? Maybe the little green men are out there, or their space ship? More than likely, just big plans by the 'crats that never materialized, but they won't give up the airspace regardless. Sad.
 
Last edited:
There's all sorts of "interesting" things out West here where government owns lots of land. Rumors and fact mix up, but I can tell ya this... The first article is goofy. Nobody needs "proximity" to a launch site anymore. What they need is fiber optics laid to it.

And Schreiver is way more interesting than Falcon in that regard...
 
You only "think" it's inactive :)

Hell George Washington has been dead for 200 years and there's still a P-area over his house.
 
Runways?

Looks more like artillery or a ballistic range and target to me.

You don't put buildings on a runway.
 
Runways?

Looks more like artillery or a ballistic range and target to me.

You don't put buildings on a runway.

No - not "Runways". what I used was " 'runways' or whatever they are. "

You see, in colloquial American English, it's fairly common to use the " ' " to mean a skeptical, or hardly believable interpretation of the statement or word contained within. As if the statement or word were taken non-literally.

Sad that one has to take the time and effort to correct an incorrect quotation, when the posters doesn't use the actual quote, and even sadder that this kind of explanation of a non-syllogisic paradigm is needed.

I think you're just being obtuse, and this post would commonly be considered a troll. (note there is no literal quote around the word troll, which means - I think your are trolling)
 
I believe it is a missile landing area closed by notam. Hasn't been used is years.
 
Wiki -- who could have guessed? :D ;)
 
and the google earth pics are all titled "Utah Missile Launch Complex"
 
Back when Dreamland was stll known to be active I had a Vegas resident and aviation business owner relate stories from the tower controllers at North Las Vegas getting traffic coming out of Groom Lake with victor climbs to over FL500 and departing the area at M0.9+ coded as 'King Air-200/RC-12'. Lots of cool happened there.

'Gimp
 
Didn't bring up the toolbar.
 
Back
Top