I came across this language in an email about a Square Trade extended warranty:
To me, on first reading, this meant that the coverage limit would be either the actual purchase price of the item, or $59.98, whichever is lower. Does anyone else read it that way?
What it actually means, I found out, was that a warranty sold at $59.88 might cover items with prices as high as $1,000.00; but if the actual purchase price was, say, $799.00, then it would be covered for up to $799.00.
To me, it seems poorly-written. I think it should have used "coverage value" rather than "coverage price" to eliminate the ambiguity. Any thoughts?
Rich
Coverage Amount: Up to the maximum coverage price of this Protection Plan, or the purchase price of your item, whichever is lower.
Protection Plan Price: $59.88
Protection Plan Price: $59.88
To me, on first reading, this meant that the coverage limit would be either the actual purchase price of the item, or $59.98, whichever is lower. Does anyone else read it that way?
What it actually means, I found out, was that a warranty sold at $59.88 might cover items with prices as high as $1,000.00; but if the actual purchase price was, say, $799.00, then it would be covered for up to $799.00.
To me, it seems poorly-written. I think it should have used "coverage value" rather than "coverage price" to eliminate the ambiguity. Any thoughts?
Rich