- Joined
- Mar 15, 2016
- Messages
- 5,585
- Display Name
- Ari
As mentioned in the $100 hamburger thread, North Dakota has a program to get a free (read: minimum of 40 flight hours if you do nothing but this) leather jacket if you land and get stamps at each of the state's 89 public airports. One of the airports that you need to visit is 64G Page Regional. That's the one at the 36 DME from the 305 radial of the FAR VOR, cleverly charted only as a paved runway symbol and the word OBJECTIONABLE. It's also not in the A/FD.
Here is the text you can get from Skyvector, Airnav, ForeFlight, etc.:
OBJECTIONABLE TRAFFIC PATTERN CONFLICT WITH CONRAD & THOMPSON ARPTS. IN ADDITION MAN-MADE OR NATURAL OBJECTS OBSTRUCT. NOTE: AIRPORT NOT PUB IN AF/D, NOR SECTIONAL DUE TO OBJECTIONABLE AIRSPACE IAW JO 7400.2G, PARA 10-4-1B. (INFO IS AVAILABLE TO NASR USERS (E.G. AIRNAV.COM))
Let's assume the man-made or natural objects obstructing the airport are a legitimate objection to the airport. I'm not sure they are. It is in the flattest part of the world and it's 9nm away from the nearest real obstruction, the shorter of the two ridiculously tall radio masts that had the title of world's tallest man-made structures until the Burj Khalifa was topped out. But maybe there was a very tall cow standing in line with the runway when the FAA came by to check it out back in 1987 when the airport was activated.
The traffic pattern for the Thompson airport (NA21) cannot possibly be a legitimate objection unless people are flying the SR-71 and even then extending their downwind quite a bit. Thompson is 57nm away. And I can't even find an airport called Conrad in the area, although there is one in Montana (S01, 590nm away) and a Conrads Airport in Kentucky (19KY, 760nm away).
So, what gives? Is there a way to find out more about the review process for this airport to understand why it's not charted after 30 years of public use?
Here is the text you can get from Skyvector, Airnav, ForeFlight, etc.:
OBJECTIONABLE TRAFFIC PATTERN CONFLICT WITH CONRAD & THOMPSON ARPTS. IN ADDITION MAN-MADE OR NATURAL OBJECTS OBSTRUCT. NOTE: AIRPORT NOT PUB IN AF/D, NOR SECTIONAL DUE TO OBJECTIONABLE AIRSPACE IAW JO 7400.2G, PARA 10-4-1B. (INFO IS AVAILABLE TO NASR USERS (E.G. AIRNAV.COM))
Let's assume the man-made or natural objects obstructing the airport are a legitimate objection to the airport. I'm not sure they are. It is in the flattest part of the world and it's 9nm away from the nearest real obstruction, the shorter of the two ridiculously tall radio masts that had the title of world's tallest man-made structures until the Burj Khalifa was topped out. But maybe there was a very tall cow standing in line with the runway when the FAA came by to check it out back in 1987 when the airport was activated.
The traffic pattern for the Thompson airport (NA21) cannot possibly be a legitimate objection unless people are flying the SR-71 and even then extending their downwind quite a bit. Thompson is 57nm away. And I can't even find an airport called Conrad in the area, although there is one in Montana (S01, 590nm away) and a Conrads Airport in Kentucky (19KY, 760nm away).
So, what gives? Is there a way to find out more about the review process for this airport to understand why it's not charted after 30 years of public use?
