NOTAM Question

[PPC1052]

So, here is a NOTAM regarding the ILS or LOC RWY 28 AGC approach:

ILS OR LOC RWY 28, AMDT 29B...
S-LOC 28: NA EXCEPT FOR AIRCRAFT EQUIPPED WITH SUITABLE RNAV SYSTEM
WITH GPS.
MISSED APPROACH: CLIMB TO 3000 ON HEADING 280.90 FOR RADAR VECTORS
(RADAR REQUIRED),
AGC VOR OUT OF SERVICE. 1612010214-1707130214EST
​

My question is this: do they really expect me to fly the missed with the accuracy necessary to fly a fraction of a degree? Can anyone really fly 280.90 degrees? I don't think I can, and I'd prefer not to die trying.

 

[PPC1052]

And another:

!FDC 6/5029 AGC IAP ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PITTSBURGH, PA.
ILS OR LOC RWY 10, AMDT 6B...
MISSED APPROACH: CLIMB TO 2000 THEN CLIMBING RIGHT TURN TO 3000 ON
HEADING 279 AND MMJ R-190 TO HYETO INT AND HOLD SW, RT, 057.17
INBOUND,
AGC VOR OUT OF SERVICE. 1612010214-1707130214EST
​

Here is the approach plate: https://www.airnav.com/depart?http://155.178.201.160/d-tpp/1702/00326IL10.PDF

So, as I read this, I am to hold south west of HYETO, make right turns, heading 057.17 inbounds. How do you do that without GPS? If so, why don't they say GPS required? Why didn't they just use the published hold?

 

[Palmpilot]

Looks like somebody goofed.

 

[aterpster]

So, here is a NOTAM regarding the ILS or LOC RWY 28 AGC approach:

ILS OR LOC RWY 28, AMDT 29B...
S-LOC 28: NA EXCEPT FOR AIRCRAFT EQUIPPED WITH SUITABLE RNAV SYSTEM
WITH GPS.
MISSED APPROACH: CLIMB TO 3000 ON HEADING 280.90 FOR RADAR VECTORS
(RADAR REQUIRED),
AGC VOR OUT OF SERVICE. 1612010214-1707130214EST
​

My question is this: do they really expect me to fly the missed with the accuracy necessary to fly a fraction of a degree? Can anyone really fly 280.90 degrees? I don't think I can, and I'd prefer not to die trying.

Procedures design is to the nearest hundredth of a degree. Chart makers are asute enough to round to the nearest whole degree. Procedures designers (who issue such NOTAMs) have a bit more tunnel vision.