Let'sgoflying!
Touchdown! Greaser!
Ref: emailing to several folks at once.
One fam member is p'd that we all email as a group.....but do not Bcc everyone.
This f.m. feels we should never send emails without removing all traces of addresses and other IDs.
Here are my counter arguments
1. it is just a whole lot easier to punch through email to a, b, c, d, without the rigamarole of selecting Bcc for each one.
2. I like to see who the email is sent to! In case someone is left out, in case the topic needs to be discussed with one of the recipients, lots of other reasons.
3. I have had no problems, and can recall hearing of no problems with this. I am sure *someone* has had problems but it is not high on the scale of 'needs worrying about'.
4. If I receive a bcc: email, you are probably not going to get a reply from me. It seems like such an email is impersonal, and you probably don't want a reply from the 100 people you sent it to.
5. We all should have adequate antispam protection to counter any problems it might cause anyway.
Your thoughts?
One fam member is p'd that we all email as a group.....but do not Bcc everyone.
This f.m. feels we should never send emails without removing all traces of addresses and other IDs.
Here are my counter arguments
1. it is just a whole lot easier to punch through email to a, b, c, d, without the rigamarole of selecting Bcc for each one.
2. I like to see who the email is sent to! In case someone is left out, in case the topic needs to be discussed with one of the recipients, lots of other reasons.
3. I have had no problems, and can recall hearing of no problems with this. I am sure *someone* has had problems but it is not high on the scale of 'needs worrying about'.
4. If I receive a bcc: email, you are probably not going to get a reply from me. It seems like such an email is impersonal, and you probably don't want a reply from the 100 people you sent it to.
5. We all should have adequate antispam protection to counter any problems it might cause anyway.
Your thoughts?