See USA Today for the story but one has to think someone has his priorities all screwed up! I agree that a Mil drone pilot has contributed to the effort and deserves recognition, but really....



.
The problem is the medal's rank, not its existence.
Many military medals are dubious. A few of them once adorned my own chest -- and I'd be hard pressed to recall exactly what I did to deserve them. At least the medal in this case would reward actual, individual accomplishments.
But to rank it above medals awarded for valor, at risk of life and limb, is an insult.
-Rich
At any gathering of military types you always scan the ribbons worn by the members. Your rack is your resume, and anyone can read your service history at a glance. EXCEPT for the USAF. I swear I have seen E-4s with three rows of ribbons who have never been outside CONUS. A friend of mine claimed, (half jokingly) that the AF has ribbons for "shiniest shoes two quarters running" and "outstanding mess hall attendance". I cannot refute this claim.
Check the starting salary for civilian drone pilots (about $100,000) and compare it to starting regional airline pilots (south of $25,000).
They've got to reward the military drone pilots are they'll go civilian as soon as their time is up.






At any gathering of military types you always scan the ribbons worn by the members. Your rack is your resume, and anyone can read your service history at a glance. EXCEPT for the USAF. I swear I have seen E-4s with three rows of ribbons who have never been outside CONUS. A friend of mine claimed, (half jokingly) that the AF has ribbons for "shiniest shoes two quarters running" and "outstanding mess hall attendance". I cannot refute this claim.
Troops use humor to disparage new medal
By Jennifer Hlad
The Distinguished Warfare Medal was established to acknowledge the most modern technology, but servicemembers and veterans are responding to the award’s creation in a decidedly old-school way: Mocking it mercilessly.
Along with an avalanche of Whiskey Tango Foxtrots and a tsunami of outrage, troops are circulating a photo of a gold-plated X-Box controller and the skull-emblazoned “Call of Duty” medal as “prototypes” of the new award, which honors servicemembers like drone pilots and computer hackers who impact combat operations from afar. The medal is being called the Chairborne Medal, the Distant Warfare Medal and the Purple Buttocks, among other names.
The Onion-esque military website “The Duffel Blog” poked fun at the new medal by posting two related stories: “Drone Pilot To Receive First Air Force Medal of Honor Since Vietnam” and “Heroic Predator Drone Is First Recipient of Distinguished Warfare Medal.”
“Doctrine Man,” an Army officer and purveyor of military humor, referred to the medal as a “pledge pin” and drew a comic suggesting that some drone pilots could earn the medal by flying a mission from the safety of the head. Then, drawing parallels to “A Few Good Men’s” Col. Jessup, he posted the comic in mouse pad form with the quote, “You need me on that joystick!”
So while the first servicemember to earn the medal will need to be an exceptional drone pilot or cyber whiz, he or she may also need a thick skin to wear it in public.
I don't know the details of the British system, but it's a fracking embarrassment that we have airmen with 2 years of service wearing two rows of ribbons, while the fracking chief mucky-muck of the whole fracking Royal Air Force has only one full row!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But does the airman have the 'the Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath' ?
Do you HAVE to wear all your ribbons ?

I've got a buddy who flew B-52's and U-2's. Then he got to supervise some reservists down in the SW flying UAVs. Flight pay is one thing but these people think they ought to get hazardous duty pay. He bristles about 12 hour missions (and in the U-2, in a flight suit where he couldn't hardly move) where these guys just walk back to coffee pot or bathroom and go home at the end of the day. If they screw up or get shot down, they just out another quarter in the machine and have another go.
While their might be instances of remote control from safe places there probably are some remotes with some level of risk as well.
If they screw up they can go to jail the rest of their lives....their could be emotional issues after all killing is killing when the conscience alerts to this it has to be dealt with. No they are not in the line of fire like a grunt on partol but they are not meter maids either.
While their might be instances of remote control from safe places there probably are some remotes with some level of risk as well.
Hagel eliminates ‘drone medal,’ creates device for existing medals
By Chris Carroll
Stars and Stripes
Published: April 15, 2013
WASHINGTON — The so-called “drone medal” is no more.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced Monday he would follow the advice of a review overseen by Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey and replace the medal intended to recognize drone operators and cyber warriors with a “new distinguishing device that can be affixed to existing medals to recognize the extraordinary actions of this small number of men and women.”
The Distinguished Warfare Medal, announced in February by then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, created a firestorm of controversy when it was ranked above some that require servicemembers to risk life and limb to be eligible, such as the Purple Heart and Bronze Star, which are frequently rewarded for valor in combat.
Legislators and veterans groups derided the medal, and it also was mocked by some in the ranks, who suggested the award could be a gold-plated Xbox controller, among other things.
The medal “undermines all other valor awards,” said Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., a veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan who introduced legislation to rank the medal below the Purple Heart. Veterans of Foreign Wars National Commander John E. Hamilton meanwhile said “medals that can only be earned in direct combat must mean more than medals awarded in the rear.”
Hagel last month ordered Dempsey to lead a review of the medal. The result is that combat medals will continue to be awarded only to those who risk all, he wrote in a memo to military leaders.
“Utilizing a distinguishing device to recognize impacts on combat operations reserves our existing combat medals for those Service members who incur the physical risk and hardship of combat, perform valorous acts, are wounded in combat, or as a result of combat give their last full measure for our Nation,” Hagel said in a letter dated Monday.
In an earlier letter to veterans organizations sent prior to his ordering of the review, Hagel said it was important to recognize the changing face of warfare with the new medal.
“Since Sept. 11, 2001, technological advancements have, in some cases dramatically changed how we conduct and support combat and other military operations. Accordingly the [Distinguished Warfare Medal] award criteria intentionally does not include a geographic limitation on the award, as it is intended for use as a means to recognize all servicemembers who meet the criteria, regardless of the domain used or the member’s physical location,” Hagel wrote.
Veterans groups applauded Hagel’s decision.
“The VFW is appreciative of the Joint Chiefs of Staff for their review, and commends Secretary Hagel for taking this issue on so early in his tenure,” said VFW’s Hamilton. “This decision will clearly keep medals that can only be earned in combat in their high order of precedence, while providing proper recognition to all who support our warfighters regardless of their distance from the fight.”
American Legion National Commander James E. Koutz said replacing the medal with a device puts the valuable contributions of drone operators and cyber warriors in the proper perspective.
“Cyber and drone warfare have become part of the equation for 21st-century warfare, and those who fight such battles with distinction certainly deserve to be recognized,” he said. “But The American Legion still believes there’s a fundamental difference between those who fight remotely, or via computer, and those fighting against an enemy who is trying to kill them.”
Defense leaders and veterans organizations will confer on the nature of the new device, as well as “a clear definition of the eligibility criteria for award of the device,” Hagel said.
Hagel said he wanted the design and criteria for the new device to review within 90 days.
[email protected]
Twitter: @ChrisCarroll_