Geico266
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2008
- Messages
- 19,136
- Location
- Husker Nation, NE
- Display Name
- Geico
- Home Airfield
- KCEK

Bumped!What the hell happened? Did he bump one of the others or mechanical issue?
Ceilings were just about 1,000 at MLI most of the day....And what is up with the weather BS? It is either safe to fly or it isn't. You don't go pushing the weather envelope just to put on a show for the crowd. No 'great pilot' does that. I somehow doubt weather was the issue.
KMLI 012352Z 04010KT 10SM FEW037 SCT050 OVC080 22/19 A2990 RMK AO2 RAB29E39 SLP122 P0000 60006 T02220194 10239 20217 58003Ceilings were just about 1,000 at MLI most of the day....

KMLI 012352Z 04010KT 10SM FEW037 SCT050 OVC080 22/19 A2990 RMK AO2 RAB29E39 SLP122 P0000 60006 T02220194 10239 20217 58003
KMLI 012252Z 05012G21KT 10SM SCT028 BKN036 OVC065 23/19 A2990 RMK AO2 SLP121 T02280194
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 012223Z 06017G22KT 10SM SCT028 OVC041 23/19 A2990 RMK AO2[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 012152Z 05013G19KT 10SM OVC023 23/19 A2991 RMK AO2 SLP124 T02330194[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 012111Z 04015G22KT 10SM OVC016 23/21 A2991 RMK AO2[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 012052Z 05010KT 10SM OVC014 24/22 A2991 RMK AO2 RAE09 SLP124 P0000 60006 T02390217 58017[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011952Z 06012KT 6SM -RA BR OVC012 22/21 A2993 RMK AO2 SLP130 P0003 T02220211[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011852Z 07013KT 9SM -RA OVC012 22/21 A2995 RMK AO2 SLP137 P0003 T02220206[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011752Z 07012KT 10SM -RA OVC014 22/20 A2996 RMK AO2 SLP141 P0001 60024 T02170200 10217 20200 58006[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011720Z 06011KT 10SM -RA BKN021 BKN028 OVC042 21/19 A2996 RMK AO2 P0001[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011652Z 05013G21KT 7SM -RA FEW031 BKN070 OVC100 21/19 A2997 RMK AO2 SLP143 P0010 T02110194[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011552Z 07013KT 5SM -RA BR SCT012 BKN041 OVC060 21/19 A2998 RMK AO2 SLP150 P0009 T02060194[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011452Z 07014KT 6SM RA BR FEW013 BKN037 OVC048 20/18 A2998 RMK AO2 SLP147 P0004 60004 T02000183 51002[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011405Z 07014KT 8SM -RA SCT016 SCT046 BKN060 21/18 A2997 RMK AO2 P0001[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011352Z 07015G20KT 7SM -RA BKN016 BKN044 OVC060 21/17 A2998 RMK AO2 RAB29 SLP147 P0000 T02060172[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011329Z 06012KT 10SM -RA BKN016 OVC060 21/17 A2998 RMK AO2 RAB29 P0000[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011315Z 06012KT 10SM BKN016 BKN065 BKN085 21/16 A2998 RMK AO2[/FONT]
[FONT=Monospace,Courier]KMLI 011252Z 07010KT 10SM FEW070 SCT085 21/16 A2997 RMK AO2 RAB11E21 SLP146 P0000 T02060161[/FONT]
OK -- Bruce said MLI.Quad City Airshow isn't flown at MLI. It's at DVN.
I believe they are just deactivated, not removed.They take the original ejection seats out of those things for civilian use, right?
I believe they are just deactivated, not removed.
Why deactivate them?
Actually, the Russians built some highly capable seats, in particular as demonstrated (not by plan) at the Paris Air Show in 1989....and none of those old East Block seats are meant for low altitude.
I can't remember if it was here or on another forum, but someone recently mentioned that there was some FAA stipulation related to the airworthiness certificates that required the seats to be deactivated in order to fly them in the US. I do know there are a few out there that still have them working, but not sure how they got around the restriction.Why deactivate them?
Actually, the Russians built some highly capable seats, in particular as demonstrated (not by plan) at the Paris Air Show in 1989.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YL1FblthxQ0
Neither the Martin-Baker seats or the General Dynamics ejection capsule I rode would have got me out of that one.
Another video.
Why deactivate them?
Another video.
Not where that guy went out. Those were both zero-zero-zero systems -- zero speed, zero sink, zero bank. In that vertical dive at the ground from under 300 feet, you'd never make it in either the Martin-Baker in the F-4 or the F-111 capsule. ACES II, maybe, but not the systems on which I rode. In fact, my sponsor at Cannon AFB died after attempting to eject in less demanding conditions and the main chute didn't have time to deploy. The capsule hit hard and they were killed on impact.They would have been in the envolpes of the F-4 MB seat and the F-111 capsule as long as the handles were pulled promptly.
it's harder to hear the people who went to watch the show crying, then it is to see the crash.
The pilot knew the risks. I doubt it ever entered the minds of the viewers.
What is a "signature switch break-up"? I've never heard of such a maneuver, and I really couldn't tell from that video what they were trying to do. I did hear the announcer say they would be operating "within inches of each other," and that would be too bloody close for amateurs -- even the Blues don't get within two feet of each other.Another video.![]()
I did hear the announcer say they would be operating "within inches of each other," and that would be too bloody close for amateurs -- even the Blues don't get within two feet of each other.
I do a good bit of formation work with other FFI-certified folks, and we generally work 6-10 feet apart. I understand the use of hyperbole by an announcer, but "within inches"?I can measure how far I am from you in inches, so I think it's more to wow the crowed the they are really suposed to get that close.
How many feet?I would suspect they are feet away from each other, when they do it right.
Right wing -- "Glenn", according to other sources.Video made it appear that right was closing under lead. Which plane hit the ground?
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap...S3AVMQ?docId=30ac11da16364f3e81e604f32e521a34Right wing -- "Glenn", according to other sources.
I do a good bit of formation work with other FFI-certified folks, and we generally work 6-10 feet apart. I understand the use of hyperbole by an announcer, but "within inches"?
How many feet?
...and you practice it on a daily basis.A few feet looks like inches from the ground. That being said, people that don't fly, and don't have experience flying form, naturally think that it is really challenging and dangerous because you are going fast. They don't stop to think of the relative motion, which is/should be quite low, making it quite easy to fly very close form if you know what you are doing.
Maybe so, but when I haven't done any formation for a few weeks, I really feel the difference. OTOH, after four or five days of 2-a-days, it starts to groove in again. But at age 61, I know I'll never be able to fly as well as I could 20 years ago.Like riding a bike I guess.
Agreed. Rejoins are a lot scarier than a lot of people realize, because your're aiming your plane right at lead's plane, not just flying in the same direction. But the timing and precise positioning necessary for manevers like the Blues' "tuck away" cross is still of the highest order.The one that the Blues do that does really impress me is when the opposing solo re-joins on the diamond with like 3-400kts Vc on the inside of their turn, and then just stops it perfectly in tight parade. That does take some skill, and while I have affected some pretty SH joins in the ol' Hornet, and while it also can dump 100 or so knts in a matter of 2-3 seconds with a little cross control action, that is still an impressive feat of airmanship IMHO.
A few feet looks like inches from the ground. That being said, people that don't fly, and don't have experience flying form, naturally think that it is really challenging and dangerous because you are going fast. They don't stop to think of the relative motion, which is/should be quite low, making it quite easy to fly very close form if you know what you are doing. Like riding a bike I guess. The one that the Blues do that does really impress me is when the opposing solo re-joins on the diamond with like 3-400kts Vc on the inside of their turn, and then just stops it perfectly in tight parade. That does take some skill, and while I have affected some pretty SH joins in the ol' Hornet, and while it also can dump 100 or so knts in a matter of 2-3 seconds with a little cross control action, that is still an impressive feat of airmanship IMHO.[/QUOTE
As a former controller whose done quite a few GCAs, what always impressed me was how you guys do section GCAs in the soup. That must be completely disorienting trying to fly off of a wing while dirtying up the aircraft with all the power changes involved. Later on instructing in Black Hawks I'd tell the guys how fighters do section IMC approaches and they didn't believe me. "No way ,how do they see each other in the clouds?" :wink2:
A few feet looks like inches from the ground. That being said, people that don't fly, and don't have experience flying form, naturally think that it is really challenging and dangerous because you are going fast. They don't stop to think of the relative motion, which is/should be quite low, making it quite easy to fly very close form if you know what you are doing. Like riding a bike I guess. The one that the Blues do that does really impress me is when the opposing solo re-joins on the diamond with like 3-400kts Vc on the inside of their turn, and then just stops it perfectly in tight parade. That does take some skill, and while I have affected some pretty SH joins in the ol' Hornet, and while it also can dump 100 or so knts in a matter of 2-3 seconds with a little cross control action, that is still an impressive feat of airmanship IMHO.[/QUOTE
As a former controller whose done quite a few GCAs, what always impressed me was how you guys do section GCAs in the soup. That must be completely disorienting trying to fly off of a wing while dirtying up the aircraft with all the power changes involved. Later on instructing in Black Hawks I'd tell the guys how fighters do section IMC approaches and they didn't believe me. "No way ,how do they see each other in the clouds?" :wink2:
That is probably my least favorite thing to do aside from night traps at the boat but in terms of stick and rudder monkey skills it isn't too bad, it just sucks because you have very little time for other SA building activities when you are flying that close. That said after a while you start to recognize that most non convective clouds aren't that dense and you can afford to fly a little looser for the sake of your own comfort, and still keep sight of your lead.
...and you practice it on a daily basis.
Maybe so, but when I haven't done any formation for a few weeks, I really feel the difference. OTOH, after four or five days of 2-a-days, it starts to groove in again. But at age 61, I know I'll never be able to fly as well as I could 20 years ago.
Agreed. Rejoins are a lot scarier than a lot of people realize, because your're aiming your plane right at lead's plane, not just flying in the same direction. But the timing and precise positioning necessary for manevers like the Blues' "tuck away" cross is still of the highest order.
That is probably my least favorite thing to do aside from night traps at the boat but in terms of stick and rudder monkey skills it isn't too bad, it just sucks because you have very little time for other SA building activities when you are flying that close. That said after a while you start to recognize that most non convective clouds aren't that dense and you can afford to fly a little looser for the sake of your own comfort, and still keep sight of your lead.
Never had a guy lose sight of lead on a GCA. It's happened a few times while I worked approach during convective stuff. Gotta be a little scary cruising along by yourself while 3 of your buddies are heading the other way. Of course I never heard any nerves in a fighter pilot's voice.![]()
Have they released the name of the pilot who died?