Ever since my CFI checkride I've operated under the knowledge that all endorsements must be legible and contain specific wording...the BFR must say 'satisfactorily completed' 61.56...must be signed, dated, with exp. date of CFI # and that must be legible...in other words, the only portion of the BFR endorsement that can be illegible is the signature...
Since many logbooks already have the pre-printed format, this is easy. For those hand-written entries, this would still be expected...
Question: if the endorsement wording isn't legible, is it still valid? I say no but others disagree.
Your thoughts?
Since many logbooks already have the pre-printed format, this is easy. For those hand-written entries, this would still be expected...
Question: if the endorsement wording isn't legible, is it still valid? I say no but others disagree.
Your thoughts?