alaskaflyer
Final Approach
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2006
- Messages
- 7,544
- Location
- Smith Valley, Nevada
- Display Name
Display name:
Alaskaflyer
http://www.adn.com/static/images/pdf/mavrik_eor_a.pdf
What a cluster. Dude, you are making us look bad.
What a cluster. Dude, you are making us look bad.
Under 49 U.S.C. § 46105(c) the Administrator has determined that an emergency exists related to safety in air commerce. You falsely represented in your August 9, 2006, application for a medical certificate that the date of your last application was July 1, 2005, when you knew that your last application was submitted on August 1, 2006. Thus, the aviation medical examiner to whom you submitted the August 9, 2006, application was not aware of the August 1, 2006, application that was deferred or the recent driver’s license action you reported on it. Had you correctly stated that you had submitted an application on August 1, 2006, and had you indicated that your “already reported” explanation for your response to question 18v referred to your August 1, 2006, application, then this relevant information would have been available to the aviation medical examiner in deciding whether to defer the issuance of the certificate.
You also falsely represented the maximum gross takeoff weight for a civil aircraft in a required maintenance record that you knew would be used and relied upon by pilots and FAA inspectors in determining what could be carried in the aircraft without exceeding an operational limitation. By falsely stating the useful load in a document on which you knew others would rely, you caused them to overload the aircraft thereby endangering the lives of others and their property.
Further, you attempted to disguise operations subject to Parts 119 and 135 of the FAR as being a lease and not subject to those requirements, and you represented in an application for a special use permit in a National Wildlife Refuge that Exousia, d/b/a Mavrik Aire, was authorized to use an aircraft in those operations when that aircraft was not listed in the operations specifications for Mavrik Aire.
In addition, you have repeatedly and intentionally refused to surrender the medical certificate second class that you obtained because of the intentionally false entry when the issuance was reversed by an authorized person and you were requested to surrender it.
Lastly, you have served as a check airman and a pilot in command of flights subject to Parts 119 and 135 when you were not qualified to serve in that capacity for multiple reasons on numerous occasions. In fact, you served as a check airman for Mavrik Aire only three days after having been told your check airman authority was terminated in part because you did not meet eligibility requirements. FAA Order 2150.3A, Appendix 4 (page 19, paragraph 41) recommends certificate revocation as the appropriate sanction for intentional falsification.
Air safety depends on, among other things, the trustworthiness of all certificate holders functioning in the system. Certificate holders who intentionally falsify applications for certificates as well as documents relied upon by others to determine the safe loading of an aircraft, compromise the certification process as well as the safety of flights, and thereby pose a threat to air safety. Your willingness to make false representations in order to make it appear there was no reason to question your eligibility for medical certification and that an aircraft could carry a larger load than it was certificated to carry show that you cannot be trusted to maintain the integrity of aviation’s trustbased application and recordkeeping systems. Further, your willingness to engage in an attempt to circumvent regulatory requirements, serve as a check airman after being told you were not qualified, and mislead a Federal official regarding regulatory requirements as well as your repeated refusal to surrender a certificate when required to do so all show that you lack a proper compliance disposition. Thus, your actions as described above clearly reflect a lack of the qualifications necessary to hold an airman certificate.
In conclusion, the Administrator has determined that because the violations described aboveestablish that you are not qualified to hold any pilot, medical, or mechanic certificate, any exercise by you of the privileges of any such certificate presents an unacceptable risk to aviation safety. The Administrator, therefore, finds in accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 46105(c) and the guidance found in FAA Order 2150.3A, paragraphs 206(d) (pages 2628
of Chapter 2) and 1202(h), that allowing you to hold your pilot, medical, or mechanic certificates while any proceedings related to the issuance of this Order are pending is contrary to the interest of safety in air commerce.
Last edited: