I can't be the only one who's noticed...

L

Lindberg

Final Approach
Joined
Sep 25, 2013
Messages
7,000
Location
North Texas
Display Name
Display name:
Lindberg
that there are certain members who seem to only start threads based on well trod questions that are nevertheless sure to start a passionate debate.

"I was hanging around the airport today, and some old guy who probably didn't have a medical told me that low-wing planes are must less likely to have a gear up if you do touch-and-goes after running up without pulling out of your tie down without carb heat. What do you guys think?"
 
guy be too old and lost brain cells
 
You are Not the only one to notice,, Because I am sure that I am Noticing one right Now!
This thread of yours seems to qualify You to be such a Certain Member!
Thank you for playing!
 
I am sure someone will be along soon to tell you how wrong you aren't......;)
 
30-50 year old kids on the Internet.... What is the point of this topic?
 
Lindberg said:
"I was hanging around the airport today, and some old guy who probably didn't have a medical told me that low-wing planes are must less likely to have a gear up if you do touch-and-goes after running up without pulling out of your tie down without carb heat. What do you guys think?"
Click to expand...
Is there a treadmill involved?
 
Been that way for awhile. Nothing new. I can think of one member in particular who has started two threads in the past couple of weeks that seems to write some sort of rhetoric to start-up controversy. Makes for good reading material ;)
 
Last edited:
Lindberg said:
"I was hanging around the airport today, and some old guy who probably didn't have a medical told me that low-wing planes are must less likely to have a gear up if you do touch-and-goes after running up without pulling out of your tie down without carb heat. What do you guys think?"
Click to expand...

First, you accuse someone of not having a medical. Why would you assume that? You do know what assume stands for right? Second, well yeah, low wing can't see the gear so it's potluck on landings, I mean, up or down, who knows but I'm going in anyway. Third, run ups are so out man, no one does them anymore. If they do a run up, it's on departure roll. Best to check under take off power don't ya think? And lastly, there are no carbs anymore as food processors have eliminated carbs out of our foods.
 
Last edited:
What's "A" carb heat?[/QUOTE]
mscard88 said:
First, you accuse someone of not having a medical. Why would you assume that? You do know what assume stands for right? Second, well yeah, low wing can't see the gear so it's potluck on landings, I mean, up or down, who knows but I'm going in anyway. Third, run ups are so out man, no one does them anymore. If they do a run up, it's on departure roll. Best to check under take off power don't ya think? And lastly, there are no carbs anymore as food processors have eliminated carbs out of our foods.
Click to expand...

Indeed!!! Carbs,,,, and those Gloutons,,,,,!!! Oh , My!!!!!
And I was planning for a Spiggity dinner tonight.. What was I thinking??????



The OP Is a Troll... I was nice before,,,,, but now I say it!!!
 
I hate it when someone logs IFR on the Internet.
 
mscard88 said:
First, you accuse someone of not having a medical. Why would you assume that? You do know what assume stands for right? Second, well yeah, low wing can't see the gear so it's potluck on landings, I mean, up or down, who knows but I'm going in anyway. Third, run ups are so out man, no one does them anymore. If they do a run up, it's on departure roll. Best to check under take off power don't ya think? And lastly, there are no carbs anymore as food processors have eliminated carbs out of our foods.
Click to expand...

So all foods are fuel injected now..??:confused:
 
I like to gain a little extra altitude then descend and gain a little extra airspeed. It lets me fly faster on long flights.
 
Joshuajayg said:
I like to gain a little extra altitude then descend and gain a little extra airspeed. It lets me fly faster on long flights.
Click to expand...

I knew pilots at the airline that would do that, overshoot assigned altitude by 200' then descend back down to gain speed. Thought it was stupid and still do. Not what you're doing, that's fine, but these guys that did this out of ATL on departure. I mean we were paid by the minute, what's the ****ing hurry?
 
I want to be able to take off and land from unimproved fuels in less than 150 feet, cruise at 300 knots while burning 8-9.4 gph while I carry five kids and my in laws. What plane should I get? High wing or canard? The wife wants it available in metal flake brown as well. Thanks.
 
mscard88 said:
I knew pilots at the airline that would do that, overshoot assigned altitude by 200' then descend back down to gain speed. Thought it was stupid and still do. Not what you're doing, that's fine, but these guys that did this out of ATL on departure. I mean we were paid by the minute, what's the ****ing hurry?
Click to expand...
Exactly what I was describing. I'm not gullible enough to believe crap like that. I had an instructor teach me to do it, but I think he often flew intoxicated too.
 
Acrodustertoo said:
I want to be able to take off and land from unimproved fuels in less than 150 feet, cruise at 300 knots while burning 8-9.4 gph while I carry five kids and my in laws. What plane should I get? High wing or canard? The wife wants it available in metal flake brown as well. Thanks.
Click to expand...

Turbine power Maule.

 
Acrodustertoo said:
I want to be able to take off and land from unimproved fuels in less than 150 feet, cruise at 300 knots while burning 8-9.4 gph while I carry five kids and my in laws. What plane should I get? High wing or canard? The wife wants it available in metal flake brown as well. Thanks.
Click to expand...

mscard88 said:
Turbine power Maule.
Click to expand...

Close... not really.
 
Lindberg said:
that there are certain members who seem to only start threads based on well trod questions that are nevertheless sure to start a passionate debate.
Click to expand...

This has been the case as long as I've been on PoA, and probably before that.

Trolling is against the RoC, but the MC does not read every post and every thread within every post (remember, we try to enjoy the site, too). So if you see someone that's trolling, click "Report" and report the post. Most reports result in some sort of action taken.

Before I was on the MC I didn't report much. Now that I'm on the MC, I wish I'd reported more posts before.
 
Ted DuPuis said:
This has been the case as long as I've been on PoA, and probably before that.

Trolling is against the RoC, but the MC does not read every post and every thread within every post (remember, we try to enjoy the site, too). So if you see someone that's trolling, click "Report" and report the post. Most reports result in some sort of action taken.

Before I was on the MC I didn't report much. Now that I'm on the MC, I wish I'd reported more posts before.
Click to expand...
Reported
 
mscard88 said:
I knew pilots at the airline that would do that, overshoot assigned altitude by 200' then descend back down to gain speed. Thought it was stupid and still do. Not what you're doing, that's fine, but these guys that did this out of ATL on departure. I mean we were paid by the minute, what's the ****ing hurry?
Click to expand...
How old were they?

What you describe is the old piston propliner way of transitioning to cruise (DC-6/B377/Connie...etc). I've never heard of jet guys doing it.
 
Fearless Tower said:
How old were they?

What you describe is the old piston propliner way of transitioning to cruise (DC-6/B377/Connie...etc). I've never heard of jet guys doing it.
Click to expand...
My Altimatic IIIc does it automatically...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top