RyanShort1
Final Approach
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2010
- Messages
- 6,480
- Location
- Dallas, Texas
- Display Name
- RyanShort1
- Home Airfield
- KRBD
That is the strangest NTSB report I've ever read.
How could that happen?
That is the strangest NTSB report I've ever read.
That reminded of this report. Thing one had no chance. The factual report is even more interesting.
http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief.aspx?ev_id=20110815X44012&key=1
How do you not have a valid ticket yet the report call you a private pilot? I'm offended that the NTSB conferred qualification equal to my own that this PERSON did not earn.
My only guess is that the guy had absolutely no feel for his aircraft.ASI malfunction perhaps?
I can see how it would be difficult not to trust your ASI, if we assume it was malfunctioning. That's a good lesson there, if that was the case, and let's say you didn't have much time in that particular aircraft, so the feel of it would be minimal if at all. What are some other ways to manage your approach with no ASI? What would be some signs of the ASI being the issue?
Stall horn would be going off - if it wasn't disconnected. Controls would be sloppy. I would setup a high base to final, then give myself a good decent rate and short-field flare or just biz jet that thing onto the runway.
I know there are some better ways, and I like to hear how others would approach the same issue.

Good questions. Assuming I was unfamiliar with an aircraft I would be very conservative in maneuvers, even though I am the world's greatest pilot, and keep speed up. You plan for putting some altitude in the energy bank for approach is right on the money, IMHO. I would like to think having experienced a near stall tuning to final with X degrees of bank at Airspeed X would be a clue not to enter that corner of the envelope again.
![]()
I read the report as saying that he was, at one time, legal but had subsequently lost his medical due to cataracts. Not passing a medical doesn't take his certificate away.
NTSB said:He had been granted special medical authorizations in October 2006 and December 2007, but was denied medical certification in July of 2008. Denial was based upon, among other things, bilateral cataracts.
The report did say that he did not have a valid pilot certificate, though. So there is evidently more to this story than was stated in the report.I read the report as saying that he was, at one time, legal but had subsequently lost his medical due to cataracts. Not passing a medical doesn't take his certificate away.
I know there are some better ways, and I like to hear how others would approach the same issue.
Well isn't that obvious???That is the strangest NTSB report I've ever read.
How could that happen?
On May 4, 2013, about 1300 eastern daylight time, an experimental amateur-built Rans S6S, N388KB, was substantially damaged when it collided with terrain during an uncontrolled descent near Suffolk Executive Airport (SFQ), Suffolk, Virginia. The private pilot and passenger were fatally injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the flight
It's funny -- I lost the ASI in a POS rental bird when I had maybe 80 hours in the logbook.
I was so new, I didn't even realize how serious a problem this could be. I also learned that I flew the pattern primarily by visual and audio cues -- not so much by airspeed.
I just set the throttle at 1700 RPMs, (it was a fixed pitch prop) and landed. It was a total non-event.
I have no idea how someone could be so out of touch with an aircraft that they could stall it multiple times in the pattern.

That makes a lot more sense... not that it matters to them anymore, RIP.To the OP,
I heard one therory was the PIC had some sort of medical emergency and his non pilot son was attempting to land the plane and he was the one that made the numerous approaches. RIP to both involved. These guys were friends of a friend of mine, so the info is second to third hand at best.
Mike in NJ
That reminded of this report. Thing one had no chance. The factual report is even more interesting.
http://www.ntsb.gov/aviationquery/brief.aspx?ev_id=20110815X44012&key=1
The pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed, which resulted in a stall.

To the OP,
I heard one therory was the PIC had some sort of medical emergency and his non pilot son was attempting to land the plane and he was the one that made the numerous approaches. RIP to both involved. These guys were friends of a friend of mine, so the info is second to third hand at best.
Mike in NJ