My reading of 91.205 conflicts with information received from peers:
How many horizon-indicating devices are required for Instrument Flight?
My reading of 91.205 conflicts with information received from peers:
How many horizon-indicating devices are required for Instrument Flight?
...except in 91.205(d)(3)(i), and FAA guidance that says you can replace a rate of turn indicator in a light airplane with a second AI.Your answers for required equipment are found in TOMATO FLAMES and GRAB CARD, pilgrim.
But what's confusing about 91.205(d)(8)? It says simply "Gyroscopic pitch and bank indicator (artificial horizon).
There's no requirement for more than one.
...except in 91.205(d)(3)(i), and FAA guidance that says you can replace a rate of turn indicator in a light airplane with a second AI.
True, but that says under what circumstances you can skip a rate of turn indicator, not how many AI you would need.
The FARs clearly reference an optional "third" AI, but I can't find any reference to a "second" one.
Required Number of Attitude Indicators for Instrument Flight that I Can Find:
- one - FAR 91.205(d)(8) unconditionally requires a “gyroscopic pitch and bank indicator (artificial horizon)”
- Two - ???
- Three - FAR 91.205(d)(3)(1) conditionally requires a “third” attitude indicator in order to legally not have a gyroscopic rate-of-turn indicator
Any help? I'm probably missing something.
When do you legally "need" two?
Two pilot aircraft.
Two pilot aircraft.
Thanks. If you know, is that in 205 somewhere, or somewhere else?
Thanks. If you know, is that in 205 somewhere, or somewhere else?
...or when replacing a turn gyro in a single pilot aircraft per AC 91-75.
http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC91-75.pdf
Yep, that's another one, although I prefer to keep a needle and ball.
Real pilots all do.
IMO, a needle and ball are superior as part of the instrument group up to about 180-200 KTAS, above which the additional AI becomes more useful.