Helicopters on this forum?

4

4RNB

Line Up and Wait
PoA Supporter
Joined
May 24, 2016
Messages
845
Display Name
Display name:
4RNB
Where do I go to obsess over helicopters?

Biggest thing I want to know is what base level model might a 6'6" almost 300# guy fit in?
 
My recommendation would be to find a semi local helicopter guy to work with. Compared to airplanes, the helicopter market is pretty small and I've never seen much online.
 
Plenty of room. Only does a little over 80 kts on a good day but is still a blast to fly NOE with doors off.

IMG_8682.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Brad Z said:
If you can find one, a Bell 47 would fit the bill. Not too many left in flight training these days, however.
Click to expand...

The best course of action would be to buy one. In my opinion the Bell 47 is a great helicopter to learn in and would be pretty gentle on the pocketbook for low use personal ownership. Parts a are getting harder to come by however, so I would want to work with an experienced mechanic to care for it. Hence my original suggestion to find a local guy to help influence a decision.

The only problem I see with learning to fly in a B47 is that it'll likely spoil you.
 
Enstrom Helicopter

F28F-Sharkey-2-1024x623.jpg
 
mondtster said:
The best course of action would be to buy one. In my opinion the Bell 47 is a great helicopter to learn in and would be pretty gentle on the pocketbook for low use personal ownership. Parts a are getting harder to come by however, so I would want to work with an experienced mechanic to care for it. Hence my original suggestion to find a local guy to help influence a decision.

The only problem I see with learning to fly in a B47 is that it'll likely spoil you.
Click to expand...
Bart Kelly at Bell Helicopter was a very tall guy. He directed the cockpit design of the 47 and as a result the cyclic control was higher than normal. For big pilots it’s ideal.
 
4RNB said:
Well that picture does not give me enough info to learn. My read of the N# takes me to a Kodiak fixed wing...
Click to expand...
Schweitzer 300. Army used them (TH-55) with guys 6’4” so it’s doable. Might have to tilt your head slightly forward. Don’t know how much 300 lbs would affect W&B though.

Tall Helicoper Pilots

Question for the board I'm 6'4" and looking at helicopter flight training. I was wondering if any other tall pilots here could help me in choosing the right helicopter to train in. I know the R-22 is the standard today, but I fear I maybe too tall to fit inside. If anyone here has trained in this...
helicopterforum.verticalreference.com
 
mondtster said:
the helicopter market is pretty small and I've never seen much online.
Click to expand...

pprune.org has a helicopter section.

Rotorheads - PPRuNe Forums

Rotorheads - A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them
www.pprune.org

Don't worry too much about the "professional" tags. In the heli section all aviators and prospects seem welcome. Just don't post photos of your first solo in the main "Rumours and News" forum.

Bit of a UK lean I guess however there is plenty US and other international inputs. Maybe try posting your question there.
 
Last edited:
Nap of the Earth - i.e. low level flying.

The Hughes 300/ TH55 is accommodating to pilots up to around 6'7". Lateral CG in them might be a bit of an adjustment but you will not be forward CG.
 
I feel like R44’s have become the industry’s gold standard for multipurpose rotorcraft operations.
 
4RNB said:
Where do I go to obsess over helicopters?
Click to expand...
Depends how deep you want to go down that rabbit hole. But I usually recommend looking for a local ops that offers helicopter discovery flights.

Last one I arranged cost $200 in an R44 and had a mini-ground school and 40 mins actual flight time. After that then you can see how obsessed you really are.
 
RyanB said:
I feel like R44’s have become the industry’s gold standard for multipurpose rotorcraft operations.
Click to expand...
It depends which part of the industry. For training, yes.
 
Spring Ford said:
pprune.org has a helicopter section.

Rotorheads - PPRuNe Forums

Rotorheads - A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them
www.pprune.org

Don't worry too much about the "professional" tags. In the heli section all aviators and prospects seem welcome. Just don't post photos of your first solo in the main "Rumours and News" forum.

Bit of a UK lean I guess however there is plenty US and other international inputs. Maybe try posting your question there.
Click to expand...

I’m aware of that one. Perhaps I wasn’t clear in my comment but my point was that the market is much smaller so don’t expect the same volume of online activity that you’ll see for airplanes.

I found that talking to a couple local operators much more fruitful when I was starting out.
 
I understand why pilots like and use acronyms (writing down clearances, taxi instructions etc.), and why so many acronyms are just made up on the spot by creative aviators; however, some acronyms are a bit of a puzzle to sort out into any meaningful communications.
 
I'm 6' and 195# and doing a helicopter add-on now.

The R22 would be solo only with minimum fuel, Not a good option at all.

The R44 would fit you well, but pricy as a rental. Very fun, not too practical. Ranks up there with ASES for fun though (but a lot harder).

No idea on the other options.
 
Capngrog said:
I understand why pilots like and use acronyms (writing down clearances, taxi instructions etc.), and why so many acronyms are just made up on the spot by creative aviators; however, some acronyms are a bit of a puzzle to sort out into any meaningful communications.
Click to expand...
You probably have never served in the military. Each service has a huge list of acronyms unique to itself. I left my first joint service meeting not having a clue about half of what was said. My supervisor said not to worry as I would eventually learn. I was once tasked to go through a briefing and write down every acronym and spell out what each stood for. I was told to stop after I had twenty pages (I wasn't finished) --it was a very long briefing to general officers of every service.
 
The quintessential military acronym is FUBAR. Five letters, get it? :biggrin:
 
Witmo said:
You probably have never served in the military. Each service has a huge list of acronyms unique to itself.
Click to expand...

I served four years three months and three days in "Uncle's Airplane"(USAF) and had my enlistment extended to go over seas.
 
I was part of DAST’s (Dedicated At Sea Test) to write a DOD manual on utilizing Army Aircraft on Navy ships…part of the exercise was trying to capture Navy vs Army speak…the manual was never published. My prior experience with Navel ops made me a center point. We flew a lot but in general it’s hard to understand why why this would ever be a good idea in practice…on paper it was a good but AH-64’s and CH-47’s just have so many issues operating off a LHA’s, even worse on smaller 2 spot ships. We went to sea seven times during this testing.
 
There is a rotor forum online. And threads about helicopter flying on many boards.

I did my RH PP, CP, CFI in R-22s.
 
Capngrog said:
I served four years three months and three days in "Uncle's Airplane"(USAF) and had my enlistment extended to go over seas.
Click to expand...
Thank you for your service. My point is that all the services have unique acronyms and what's understood in one is greek to another. Until you get deal closely with the other services you don't realize it's like learning a new language.
 
Warlock said:
I was part of DAST’s (Dedicated At Sea Test) to write a DOD manual on utilizing Army Aircraft on Navy ships…part of the exercise was trying to capture Navy vs Army speak…the manual was never published. My prior experience with Navel ops made me a center point. We flew a lot but in general it’s hard to understand why why this would ever be a good idea in practice…on paper it was a good but AH-64’s and CH-47’s just have so many issues operating off a LHA’s, even worse on smaller 2 spot ships. We went to sea seven times during this testing.
Click to expand...
Reminds me of the boatload of Army Air Force B-25s on the USS Hornet. Historians tell us that the Navy guys were kind of discouraged when they thought it was just a transport mission. I don't know if they had any difficulties with service-specific acronyms, but the cheer that went up when the commanding officer announced "This force is bound for Tokyo" suggests that everyone understood what THAT meant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top