Steve
En-Route
"Opportunities for Improvement" is the catch phrase.
Ok, the fly-in was great and fun and interesting, etc. I'm not wanting to diminish that for anyone that attended. I had a great time. But if we intend to make this a long term event we need to be candid about what would make it even better or it will eventually lose its appeal, imho.
A little honest feedback is in order from those attending, so chime in while the memory is fresh. We can't do anything about your roommate's BO or hairy back, but there are a few things we do have control over. As this thing grows its going to need more organization to sustain itself.
I'll start.
1. Eating every meal in the restaurant is $$$, especially for families attending. It may be more cost effective to rely on a few dedicated participants to arrange/prepare a cookout for one or two evenings and maybe a cold lunch for the group. We could combine this with the evening outdoor theater possibly.
2. Ride schedules are catch as catch can. Some of the pilots (not me) giving rides were going non-stop and missed out on a lot of the interaction on the ground. Others (me) were willing to give rides but didn't do a lot of advertising of the fact. We don't want to make it a 135 operation but we might want to block out some hours so the pilots giving the most desireable rides (Chip, Greg, Diana, e.g.) get a break and everyone is aware of the schedule. Doesn't have to be too formal, just an outline to work within.
3. Those trees! I know part of the attraction for flying into Gaston's is the "scenic" approach, but there are a couple of trees marking the threshold that have grown quite bit over the past few years. They might not be on Gaston's property, but I'd think something could be done to "reduce their impact" on flight operations.
4. Speaking of flight operations, if there is anything I personally should do different to make things go smoother getting planes in and out I'm open to suggestion. And no, I can't do anything about Michael's Hump!![Smile :) :)]()
5. I saw very few, if any, window signs on fly-in planes, and there were over 30 I believe. Maybe a "prop tag" similar to what EAA uses could help connect names/faces with planes. There were many nice examples out there and I like to be able to acknowledge the pilots that do such a good job maintaining them.
Part of the appeal for using Gaston's is the laid back atmosphere of the place which is the main reason I'm a big proponent of the venue and I certainly don't want to make this into a regimented affair. Maybe nothing should change. I'm only asking if you think anything should.
Ok, the fly-in was great and fun and interesting, etc. I'm not wanting to diminish that for anyone that attended. I had a great time. But if we intend to make this a long term event we need to be candid about what would make it even better or it will eventually lose its appeal, imho.
A little honest feedback is in order from those attending, so chime in while the memory is fresh. We can't do anything about your roommate's BO or hairy back, but there are a few things we do have control over. As this thing grows its going to need more organization to sustain itself.
I'll start.
1. Eating every meal in the restaurant is $$$, especially for families attending. It may be more cost effective to rely on a few dedicated participants to arrange/prepare a cookout for one or two evenings and maybe a cold lunch for the group. We could combine this with the evening outdoor theater possibly.
2. Ride schedules are catch as catch can. Some of the pilots (not me) giving rides were going non-stop and missed out on a lot of the interaction on the ground. Others (me) were willing to give rides but didn't do a lot of advertising of the fact. We don't want to make it a 135 operation but we might want to block out some hours so the pilots giving the most desireable rides (Chip, Greg, Diana, e.g.) get a break and everyone is aware of the schedule. Doesn't have to be too formal, just an outline to work within.
3. Those trees! I know part of the attraction for flying into Gaston's is the "scenic" approach, but there are a couple of trees marking the threshold that have grown quite bit over the past few years. They might not be on Gaston's property, but I'd think something could be done to "reduce their impact" on flight operations.
4. Speaking of flight operations, if there is anything I personally should do different to make things go smoother getting planes in and out I'm open to suggestion. And no, I can't do anything about Michael's Hump!
5. I saw very few, if any, window signs on fly-in planes, and there were over 30 I believe. Maybe a "prop tag" similar to what EAA uses could help connect names/faces with planes. There were many nice examples out there and I like to be able to acknowledge the pilots that do such a good job maintaining them.
Part of the appeal for using Gaston's is the laid back atmosphere of the place which is the main reason I'm a big proponent of the venue and I certainly don't want to make this into a regimented affair. Maybe nothing should change. I'm only asking if you think anything should.