According to the AOPA site on flying in Canada.Everything I read says children under age 15 don't need a passport if they arrive by "land or sea". No mention of by private plane.
Just curious if anyone have experience taking minors accros the border.
Thanks
Andy
I have flown minors into Canada but all of them have had passports. I have also run into the second issue when the mother was traveling alone with her kids and didn't have this statement. I don't know if that applies to you.Each passenger must have a current passport
Children traveling with only one parent must have a notarized statement of approval from the absent parent stating the dates of the trip.
Planning on taxiing across the border?Everything I read says children under age 15 don't need a passport if they arrive by "land or sea". No mention of by private plane.
Just curious if anyone have experience taking minors accros the border.
Thanks
Andy
Each passenger must have a current passport
Children traveling with only one parent must have a notarized statement of approval from the absent parent stating the dates of the trip.
Here is more from the Canada Border Services Agency.I did not know that.
Another anti-abduction rule that I encountered was when I applied to renew my under-18-year-old son's passport. It was required that both parents be present and that I present not only the child's current passport but also his birth certificate. If 18 or over it's much easier to renew: just present the current passport and of course no parents at all.
Parents who share custody of their children should carry copies of the legal custody documents. It is also recommended that they have a consent letter from the other custodial parent to take the child on a trip out of the country. The parents’ full name, address and telephone number should be included in the consent letter.
When travelling with a group of vehicles, parents or guardians should arrive at the border in the same vehicle as the children.
Adults who are not parents or guardians should have written permission from the parents or guardians to supervise the children. The consent letter should include addresses and telephone numbers where the parents or guardian can be reached.
CBSA officers watch for missing children, and may ask detailed questions about the children who are travelling with you.
Sorry if this is hijacking a thread, but I have a quick question related.
If I take off in the US, land in the US, however fly over Canada, do I have to do anything different then if I only flew over the US?
Nothing different? I think not.Nothing different, it's as if you never left. Being under positive Air Traffic Control during the crossings makes it easier to prove.![]()
http://tfr.faa.gov/save_pages/detail_0_6432.html[FONT="]FDC 0/6432 FDC PART 4 OF 11[/FONT]
[FONT="] F. AIRCRAFT REGISTERED IN THE UNITED STATES ARE AUTHORIZED TO OPERATE TO OR FROM THE TERRITORIAL AIRSPACE OF THE U.S., IF IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 4: 1. FILE AND ARE ON AN ACTIVE FLIGHT PLAN (DVFR INCLUDED). 2. ARE EQUIPPED WITH AN OPERATIONAL MODE C OR S TRANSPONDER AND CONTINUOUSLY SQUAWK AN ATC ISSUED TRANSPONDER CODE. 3. MAINTAIN TWO-WAY COMMUNICATIONS WITH ATC. 4. COMPLY WITH ALL U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS INCLUDING ADVANCE PASSENGER INFORMATION SYSTEM (APIS) REQUIREMENTS IN 19 CFR PART 122.[/FONT]
Well... you could...Planning on taxiing across the border?
Entering Canada is a whole lot easier than entering the US. I wouldn't think that getting the non-passported kids in would be an issue, but getting them back home almost surely will. Canadians can't get into the US by air without a passport. Driving, so far, seems ok but a passport makes it easier.
I miss the days when we'd run across the border at Sumas (near Abbottsford, BC), to Spud's restaurant for lunch. Big meals at great prices. Nothing good lasts forever. Don't think Spud's is even there anymore.
Dan
So from what I read here, I need a radio operators license for both the plane and myself. Anyone have experience with this???
So from what I read here, I need a radio operators license for both the plane and myself. Anyone have experience with this???
Nothing different? I think not.
http://tfr.faa.gov/save_pages/detail_0_6432.html
So from what I read here, I need a radio operators license for both the plane and myself. Anyone have experience with this???
I have a radio operaters licence in my wallet. It has been there since 1977, no one in Canada, the US Bahamas, Cayman Islands, France has ever asked to see it. Ditto for the Radio Station Licence.

The guy was a real jerk, this was pre-9-11, so if he's still working I bet he's a joy now. As far as ATC is concerned, that's true. Since VFR flight plans also meet the requirement for being on an active flight plan, and since ATC never even sees a VFR flight plan, I would consider that maybe you aren't looking at it the right way, that the requirement for being on an active flight plan doesn't have anything to do with ATC, that ATC doesn't give two hoots, but that maybe somebody else does (thinking CBP and the Department of Fatherland Security).The poster is correct that you call ATC and get a squawk - no VFR flight plans are wanted and in fact ATC will grumpily tell you to go talk to FSS if you raise the subject... Going direct to Cleveland from Michigan I call Detroit Approach, I am handed a squawk, pointed towards Pelee Island, ordered advise them if I change heading or altitude and that is it... Passing Pelee ATC will cancel my squawk and return me to VFR while still in Canadian airspace... One time I called that ATC's supervisor and asked why they dump me off instead of handing me to Clevland Approach (per what I presume the regs require) Their answer was (paraphrased) that if I wished I could call Cleveland on my own but I had met the requirements of the regulations when I called them and asked for a squawk before entering Canada and they were not required to hold my hand every minute...
True -- and that is also consistent with the possibility that ATC has nothing to do with enforcing that part of the reg, but that it still exists and is in force. I do know that whenever I shoot approaches into City with my CFII, he always makes sure that I've filed since he knows that as far as the FAA is concerned, he'll be PIC so any violations of federal regs during the flight will fall on his head, too.Maneuvering an approach to Detroit City Airport almost always results in flying over the Windsor Canada VOR to stay out of the Detroit B and there is no discussion by ATC of flight plans etc..
I believe that place is now called "Bob's Burgers and Brew"?
I'm planning a Canadian overflight from Cleveland to Detroit shortly after I get my ticket, and have been following this thread with great interest. I just (re)applied for my Restricted Radiotelephone Operator Permit, and as far as I can tell, that's pretty much the only thing I have to do. It seems that I don't need any special markings or stickers or a 12" tail number, and all I really do is file a VFR flight plan with "Canadian overflight" in the remarks section. I'm a little curious how I make the initial call though. Does one simply call Cleveland Approach and say on my initial call that I intend Canadian overflight? Do I call Canadian ATC prior to entering? From whom do I get a code?
From reading this thread, it seems that while one can occasionally venture into Canadian airspace without much issue, I'd rather do things as "by the book" as I possibly can.
I've never flown into Canada or done an overflight, but I believe the easiest way to do an overflight is just call for flight following when you start your trip on the U.S. side. My guess would be that you would be just handed off to Canadian controllers, eh.
Just call up Cleveland Approach, tell them your destination and cruising altitude, and request flight following. You activate your VFR flight plan with FSS and it's best to do that before calling up Approach. In fact, when I use the VFR flight plan method, I generally activate with FSS by phone since there are so many FSS RCOs that are OTS that it can be hard to reach them by radio once you're airborne.I'm planning a Canadian overflight from Cleveland to Detroit shortly after I get my ticket, and have been following this thread with great interest. I just (re)applied for my Restricted Radiotelephone Operator Permit, and as far as I can tell, that's pretty much the only thing I have to do. It seems that I don't need any special markings or stickers or a 12" tail number, and all I really do is file a VFR flight plan with "Canadian overflight" in the remarks section. I'm a little curious how I make the initial call though. Does one simply call Cleveland Approach and say on my initial call that I intend Canadian overflight? Do I call Canadian ATC prior to entering? From whom do I get a code?
Yes, but that's never happened to me on a Canadian overflight and I've done this many many times. I guess it's possible, but the fact that you're required to be in two-way communication with ATC probably puts you at somewhat higher priority.That's kinda what I thought, but if Cleveland is too busy to get me into the system, does that mean I can't overfly Canada?
I'm planning a Canadian overflight from Cleveland to Detroit shortly after I get my ticket, and have been following this thread with great interest. I just (re)applied for my Restricted Radiotelephone Operator Permit, and as far as I can tell, that's pretty much the only thing I have to do. It seems that I don't need any special markings or stickers or a 12" tail number, and all I really do is file a VFR flight plan with "Canadian overflight" in the remarks section. I'm a little curious how I make the initial call though. Does one simply call Cleveland Approach and say on my initial call that I intend Canadian overflight? Do I call Canadian ATC prior to entering? From whom do I get a code?
From reading this thread, it seems that while one can occasionally venture into Canadian airspace without much issue, I'd rather do things as "by the book" as I possibly can.
Check. Plan on filing and activating prior to taking off.ChrisK,
- The flight plan must be filed (VFR or IFR)
I wasn't specific, but I plan on flying to SKY and then from SKY direct to 76G. This will make me island hop a bit, with about 14 miles max over water. Since I'm actually planning on going to Marine City rather than Detroit, I'll be bypassing all of the restricted Detroit airspace. I should have mentioned that, but having grown up in Croswell and lived in the Detroit Metro area for most of my life, I didn't want to get that specific. Hopefully this SKY -> 76G route, while it takes me over some busy island airports, will make things a little easier for me.- Contact Cleveland Approach first. They will not have your VFR flight
plan. So on your first call, you'll likely need to explain that you are "direct
Detroit" (overflying Canada) and need to maintain ATC comms/squawk.
(lest they simply RSTSVFRFCAGD). It's unlikely that you'll chat with
Canadian ATC (unless you are transiting the Windsor CZ/CDA?).
I am a little concerned about that, and plan on making some shorter excursions north of Cleveland in US airspace to get some lake experience. I will have a couple of "situational awareness" devices, and will not only be conservative with my weather decisions, but will likely run my plans by some local CFIs prior to departing due to my lack of experience. My training certainly included some haze as my home airport / area sees quite a bit of it, but your point about haze over the water is well taken. My DPE said as much about doing maneuvers over Lake Erie. He has to point all of his candidates to a heading of 180 when they leave Burke or they get completely disoriented during maneuvers with no horizon available.- Seems you are a student. Did your training include lake crossings and
haze? On hazy days, it can easily become an inadvertent VMC-to-IMC
event.
Oooh. Maybe I'll take an IFR "safety pilot" just in case.Haze over the Great Lakes can be significantly different than haze over terra firma. My first experience was a WHOA! event. Just like being in the clouds.
For a new PPL, having an autopilot/wing leveler could be a life saver.
Technically, yes you do. But I have yet to hear of anyone being asked to produce them. If I recall, it is an FCC requirement when flying internationally. So it would take someone in Canada asking to see it to make sure you were complying with an FCC rule.
Next time leave the entire line intact instead of mangling a quote to make it mean something different. In case that was an innocent mistake, go back to post #30 and you'll see that what I was suggesting as an alternative to an FSS VFR flight plan is something that has been discussed here at length, and is purely an ATC hack (for VFR only) and not a composite flight plan at all.> Particularly if you file IFR + VFR
Huh? I hope you aren't filing composite FPs until you complete your IA check ride. Until then, file a VFR flight plan using VFR altitudes.