I recall seeing, from time to time, maps and discussions of weather beyond the 48-hour timeframe I find at ADDS. I refer to NWS weather, not a commercial product.
Can anyone guide me?
Can anyone guide me?
Heck, neither do 24-Hour TAFs a good part of the time.http://www.accuweather.com
Click on 15 day forecast for your zip code. Although, as you know, that long out typically doesn't have much accuracy.
Spike,
My favorite is this:
http://www.usairnet.com/cgi-bin/launch/code.cgi
I think it is just the output of a model and isn't super accurate. But does it matter? Long-range forecasts for aviation are nearly worthless anyways. This just makes me feel better with pretty pictures
USAirnet is probably the most accurate medium-range tool there is. I've been using it extensively for years, and it's surprisingly accurate.
Scott--I think you might have misinterpreted me. I meant, that the model isn't all that accurate, but as a long range tool it doesn't matter that much because few of them are.Yes, it does matter. When no TAF is issued beyond 24 hours (except for 30 hours for 32 high-impact airports), knowing what might occur at an airport 48 hours from now may be useful.
For those reasons, you may also like this NWS product. Play with the check boxes and the date/time box to get the coverage you want. -SkipAnd like Jesse, I like the visual presentation of trends like visibility, winds, and ceilings.
Understand Spike--makes perfect sense if you must make the trip.I can often scrub a mission on a 48-hour forecast, if it's bad enough and the cost of late-cancellation is significant... but I always remain ready to cxl on short notice if the WX calls for it.
I am a weather *****, and that's OK by me.
I think it's important to look at long range forecasts as tools to understand what's out there, not to make a go/no-go decision (in all but the easiest of circumstances).As far as planning a flight or any decision around a 48 hour forecast..I don't bother..I just don't understand weather as well as you do and have found that what determines a go/no go for me is a very fine line that a weather model doesn't have the resolution for. Basically, I have yet to make a decision based on a 48 hour forecast that is right the majority of the time. I really don't even bother anymore.
Spike,
My favorite is this:
http://www.usairnet.com/cgi-bin/launch/code.cgi
I think it is just the output of a model and isn't super accurate. But does it matter? Long-range forecasts for aviation are nearly worthless anyways. This just makes me feel better with pretty pictures
I think it's important to look at long range forecasts as tools to understand what's out there, not to make a go/no-go decision (in all but the easiest of circumstances).
I'll agree long range forecasts are not very helpful for short local flights but for longer flights I find them very useful. For me knowing what kind of weather to expect in a large area helps determine routing, and what kind of flying to expect, CAVU VFR or picking my way through LIFR.
Joe
I understand and hope I didn't imply that you were doing anything wrong.I suppose Joe--to each their own--I can't control the weather and just take what nature throws at me. If nature throws too much I don't fly. I don't stress myself out over the weather.
For me, looking at long range forecasts, generally provide little value because I don't make any decisions based on them.
...
Now don't get me wrong on this, I live in Southern California and for flights in the area, a headset, maybe a chart and some TFR awareness is all I need most of the time.
Joe