What would be the chances of a plastic jar full of natural-style peanut butter bursting if it were placed in a paint shaker for about five minutes?
Thanks,
Rich
Thanks,
Rich
Standard engineering answer: it depends. If the paint shaker is at the resonant frequency of the mass of peanut butter, I could see it happening.
What would be the chances of a plastic jar full of natural-style peanut butter bursting if it were placed in a paint shaker for about five minutes?
Thanks,
Rich
What would be the chances of a plastic jar full of natural-style peanut butter bursting if it were placed in a paint shaker for about five minutes?
Thanks,
Rich
0% because the plastic jar likely wouldn't hold up to the "initial clamp down" of the paint shaker in the first place.
0% because the plastic jar likely wouldn't hold up to the "initial clamp down" of the paint shaker in the first place.
Assumes facts not in evidence.
The OP clearly states "placed in paint shaker". He does not claim it is clamped down, that the shaker is turned on, nor does he state that the paint shaker is functional or connected to power. ;-)
All of these factors (and more) would need to be understood before an accurate prediction could be given.
I was thinking about marketing peanut butter shakers, modeled on paint shakers. Little countertop jobbies. It would eliminate the trauma of stirring.
Rich
Hmmmmm..
Most peanut butter is so thick in viscosity that the device to shake it would have to shake more then a hooker in church with a 5 dollar customer outside waiting for the trick..........
![]()
I was thinking about marketing peanut butter shakers, modeled on paint shakers. Little countertop jobbies. It would eliminate the trauma of stirring.
Rich
You may actually be better off with an ultrasonic rig. Put it in oil down and turn on the ultrasonics.You might try modifying, or using the drive from, this as a start:
http://www.grainger.com/product/LAB-SAFETY-SUPPLY-Ultrasonic-Cleaner-32V115
I just motor boated my monitor





.....Hmmmmm....
Rich
Uh, do you have references to cite?
(Standard engineering answer.)
0% because the plastic jar likely wouldn't hold up to the "initial clamp down" of the paint shaker in the first place.
I was thinking about marketing peanut butter shakers, modeled on paint shakers. Little countertop jobbies. It would eliminate the trauma of stirring.
Rich
Who stirs peanut butter?
oops, just noticed the poster. My guess is that he buys "ground peanuts" not peanut butter; the grind of all "natural" peanut butter I have seen is rather coarse, causing lumps of peanuts to separate from the oil. True peanut butter is an emulsification, finely ground and mixed with the oil. Good peanut butter has chunks of broken peanuts mixed in after grinding and emulsifying.
Uh, do you have references to cite?
(Standard engineering answer.)
I was thinking about marketing peanut butter shakers, modeled on paint shakers. Little countertop jobbies. It would eliminate the trauma of stirring.
Rich
Who stirs peanut butter?
oops, just noticed the poster. My guess is that he buys "ground peanuts" not peanut butter; the grind of all "natural" peanut butter I have seen is rather coarse, causing lumps of peanuts to separate from the oil. True peanut butter is an emulsification, finely ground and mixed with the oil. Good peanut butter has chunks of broken peanuts mixed in after grinding and emulsifying.
If it works on a can of tahini I'm in. It takes me 20min to stir up a can that has been sitting a long time.
I was thinking maybe something that works like a washing machine agitator. Clamp the jar in and agitate it into well-mixed bliss. Although Henning's ultrasonic idea is still in the running. Either way, if it mixes peanut butter, I think it should mix tahini.
Rich
By the way, has anybody actually defined what the failure mode is?
I have natural peanut butter. I would not buy one piece of equipment to shake up one jar of peanut butter.
So... I guess you're not interested in getting a copy of the prospectus, either?
Rich