Engine leaning

Hi. I just discovered this board and it looks like a good place to ask my stupid questions. I say they are stupid because everyone tells me how easy it is, but it never seems easy to me.

Welcome aboard, Jenna! :)

You may have noticed, many threads here tend to "creep" as we discuss every last little thing that could possibly result in a different answer, and after a while we can get WAY off the original topic.

These questions aren't stupid, and this stuff isn't necessarily easy. It just seems easy to some people because we've spent years reading and increasing our understanding of it. So, I'll do my best to go back and answer all of your questions in as easy and reasonable of a manner as I can.

For example: ROP (Rich of Peak). Peak What?

When we talk about ROP or LOP, the "Peak" involved is peak EGT.

Do I lean to peak RPM or peak EGT?

As with so many thing in aviation, the answer is "it depends."

If you're trying to find best power mixture (for best climb performance), you'll lean to peak RPM. This is about 100 degrees rich of peak EGT. It's also probably not where you want to run your engine in cruise - You'll burn a lot of fuel.

Peak EGT is where you have the perfect stoichiometric mixture of fuel and air - All the oxygen will be used up, and all the fuel will be burned. Rich of peak you'll have some unburned fuel going out the exhaust, while lean of peak you'll have some oxygen going out the exhaust. Peak EGT is often where you'll find that the POH says to run for best range as shown in the performance charts, although you'll get even better range if you can run lean of peak EGT.

I was told to lean until it runs rough, then richen it up a little bit, but it never runs rough. At least I don't get there because the tach or the egt gauge reaches a peak then starts to drop.

Try leaning it further - I've never seen an aircraft engine that runs smoothly and then just quits. Carbureted engines are notorious for having unbalanced air flow, so I'd be especially surprised if the engine in your 172 wouldn't get rough. So, I'm guessing that maybe you're seeing a "false peak" and you're not leaning nearly as much as you could. It's been a while since I did this in a 172 specifically, and I've never done it in a 180hp 172, but based on other experiences with the O-360 engine I'd say that you should be able to get the mixture knob at least 3/4 of the way out before it gets rough (depending on atmospheric conditions, of course). It'll definitely get much farther out than peak RPM - Remember that peak RPM is still about 100 degrees rich of peak EGT, so you've got quite a ways to go after you hit peak RPM.

Should I richen it up when I notice they are dropping, or should I keep leaning until the engine runs rough. And how can you tell when it is making so much noise? What does a rough engine sound or feel like?

What causes the engine to run rough is that one cylinder has gotten so lean that it's really not developing any power any more, so instead of the smooth-ish operation you normally get with all four cylinders going bang-bang-bang-bang in perfect sequence, you'll get bang-bang-bang-miss. It's quite noticeable, and you'll both feel and hear the difference.

Ok, second question: I keep reading that you should never apply power when lean. Does never really mean never? Can you add just a little power? Or if you want to add a little power do you have to go full rich, then move the throttle and lean all over again?

Not sure where you're reading this and what the context is there, but the basic idea is that when you're properly leaned, if you add a significant amount of power, you'll be VERY lean and the engine may quit. This is also why we go full rich prior to landing - If you're still leaned out, and you go to full power for a go-around, your engine may quit right when you need it most.

It's very easy to see a demonstration of this while taxiing, and if you're leaning for taxi (you should be) and doing it right, your engine will quit if you go to runup or takeoff power. I lean the engine after start and as soon as I've checked to ensure I have oil pressure.

At idle power on the ground, lean the engine WAY out - Again, it'll be over 3/4 of the way back in most airplanes. Once you get past that, lean slowly so that you don't cause the engine to quit, but you should be right on the edge. Now, push the throttle in slowly - You'll notice the engine start to cough and run rough well before you reach runup RPM, if you did it right. If your engine doesn't quit by runup RPM, you're not leaning it enough for ground operation. (The bonus of doing this exercise is that you'll see what a rough engine feels and sounds like without any risk of it quitting in the air.)

and how about when you are taxiing? On a hot day if I am idling, I will lean it out.

You should go ahead and always lean it out during taxi operations. Up here in the cold parts, we get more lead fouling in the winter than the summer...

When I start a long taxi do I need to go rich first, add throttle to gain some speed, then lean it again?

If you do the ground leaning as I described above, you'll need to richen the mixture just a little bit, or you'll actually end up with *less* power when you add throttle because the mixture is so lean! For that reason, I usually lean it as described above, except for at 1000 RPM. You shouldn't need more than 1000 RPM to taxi in a 172, and that mixture will allow you to make the power changes you need during taxi without needing to change the mixture.

And I just read somewhere that said you should check your EGT right after takeoff and during a long climb keep leaning to keep the EGT at the takeoff value. I always heard to keep it full rich during climb.

What you read is right - If you keep it full rich during climb, as you climb the mixture will be getting richer and richer and richer as the air gets thinner and thinner, and your climb performance will begin to suffer. Full rich down low gives you a mixture with lots of power and good cooling. As you climb and the air thins, leaning the mixture a bit at a time to maintain that shortly-after-takeoff EGT will continue to give you the power and cooling you want as well as maintaining good climb performance.

Why does something that is supposed to be so easy seem so hard?

Ironically, because we try to make it easy. None of this stuff is taught to student pilots for the most part, except the "lean til rough, enrich til smooth" technique that works in most trainers, and "always full rich in the climb" that works for most training and $100 burger flights that newer pilots are doing. The "why" isn't taught, all the other mechanics of it aren't taught, because they're not on the PTS and CFI's are trying to get you up to the PTS standards as quickly as possible. In addition, many CFI's don't know this stuff themselves, so they can't possibly teach it. And frankly, many people just don't care. So, those of us who do care are left to learn it on our own, and there's a lot of details to pick up along the way.

Hey thanks for all the replies. Sorry I forgot to say what type of plane I fly. It is a 1978 Cessna 172 with a 180hp engine. I have a fuel flow gauge and an EGT gauge and of course a tach.

Since you only have one EGT gauge, you need to realize that all four cylinders will peak at different times - The airflow to the cylinders varies somewhat - and so it's difficult to run lean of peak EGT because you don't know when all your cylinders have gotten there. You essentially have four separate engines connected to the same crankshaft (and intake manifold). In theory, the EGT sensor is placed on the cylinder that runs the richest, but you really don't know for sure. That uncertainty is yet another reason why the lean-to-rough, rich-to-smooth technique is taught - It tends to work pretty well and it's hard to do better without better instrumentation.

One thing that confuses me is that they all vary so much it is hard to tell how much is due to leaning. EGT may go up when I lean then go down then go up then go down. It seems to vary even when I am not changing anything. I have seen it go over 1500 and I think it would go higher if I kept leaning but I am afraid to lean more. So I don't know if I am leaning enough or too much. The tachometer will vary from 2350 to 2450 while cruising too. Just as I think it has peaked and is starting to go down, then it goes up again. Then it goes down again but I never notice the engine running rough and I am afraid to keep leaning it.

The documentation for the JPI engine analyzer says that there may be "false peaks" as you are leaning, so you do an initial mixture pull that takes you up to the 1450+ range and then start looking for the peak. Not sure what causes that, but it may be at least part of what you're seeing.

Does the RPM vary quickly, surging for a few seconds and the like, or does it vary over time? With a fixed-pitch prop, many things can affect RPM, even if the engine is developing the same amount of power - Slight climb or descent, etc. so RPM can be quite variable in turbulence for example. Longer term, atmospheric conditions can change and other factors can affect the amount of power the engine is producing as well, which will also change the RPM.

If it's fluctuating fairly quickly, can you hear the change in pitch? If not, you might have a tach problem. If the tach needle bobbles across a range really fast, you definitely have a tach problem.

But I have one more question for now: If it is ok to run LOP, and it is ok to run ROP, then why is it so bad to lean it until some cylinders are lean, but others are still rich? At least that is what I think I read.

If you're at a high power setting with some cylinders ROP and some LOP, all of the cylinders are probably close to peak - That can be a bad place to run at high power settings. If you're below about 65% power, you can run the mixture just about anywhere and not cause problems.

Hope this helps!
 
liquid cooled auto engines, is way out of the realm of aircraft aircooled engines.

Not sure what you mean. I've disassembled a Chrysler V8, removed a head, and stared at a wrist pin. AFAIK, Chrysler has never produced an air cooled V8.

The comments about 0.5 HP/CID not being "high power" is wrong. That may not be high performance, but it's high power if it's more than 75% of its power peak.

The main reason for apparently poor specific horsepower is the low RPM and long stroke design for common aircraft engines. Even crappy car engines will spin twice as fast, which with a decent VE design, will get you twice the specific horsepower. This isn't a racing circuit, and the displacement is irrelevant (except for weight considerations). Total horsepower is all that matters; you can double the displacement to deal with a larger prop if you want to.
 
Welcome aboard, Jenna! :)

You may have noticed, many threads here tend to "creep" as we discuss every last little thing that could possibly result in a different answer, and after a while we can get WAY off the original topic.

These questions aren't stupid, and this stuff isn't necessarily easy. It just seems easy to some people because we've spent years reading and increasing our understanding of it. So, I'll do my best to go back and answer all of your questions in as easy and reasonable of a manner as I can.

Thank you so much. It is all making sense now. After reading everyone else's comments, your post really summed it up well. And it helped that you explained why it is probably taught the way it is. I always felt that when I asked my CFI these questions that he either didn't know or didn't think a girl (that was older than him) could understand. And when I asked my ex-husband, he would give me a very detailed answer, whether he knew what he was talking about or not. He would never admit he didn't know anything.

Are there any books that explain things that well?

I can't wait to go up again to see if it still makes sense when I am flying. Even with 100LL "all the way down" to $4.50/gallon, I don't want to be wasting it.
 
Henning is correct...............

Higher powered planes can do this to a perfectly good pistons....


Of course I had 7 more good pistons to "limp" back to the airport with...:yes::eek:

What were you flying that used 8 cylinders?
 
Good old PoA. Someone asks how to find the area of a circle, and they get an answer on how to do so using differential calculus.

Do you have a 4/8 or 6/12 probe CHT/EGT and a non-turbo engine?
If yes, lean as much as you can while keeping the CHT's under 400°F and preferably under 380°F.

If no, get a 4/8 or 6/12 probe CHT/EGT and keep the CHT's under 400°F and preferably under 380°F.

If you don't want an engine monitor, then take it up to a decent altitude, just keep leaning it until it gets rough. It will get rough. Then richen it until roughness goes away. Even if the engine really sputters or even quits from leaning too quickly, it will recover within 3 seconds of pushing the mixture. Or set up the mixture for your best power (speed), and then lean it out a little more until you lose a couple knots or so on speed. That's most likely where you want to be.

And now back to our Math 547 lessons...
 
there was a pretty good video by the eaa on this subject but i cant remember the link
 
I got my license over a year ago but my CFI has moved and I don't really have anybody else to ask right now. My ex-husband was a pilot and got me hooked on flying, but he developed "other interests" so to speak. So I got the plane and he got the boot.

Wow. Just wow. You divorce a guy that decides he wants a boot? :lol:


;)

Back to be semi-serious...

Did you mention what kind of plane and engine? :dunno:
 
Last edited:
Good old PoA. Someone asks how to find the area of a circle, and they get an answer on how to do so using differential calculus.

Why the attitude? Most of the people did a good job of answering the questions I wanted answered.

In the past, all I would get when I asked was stupid answers like this one:
Do you have a 4/8 or 6/12 probe CHT/EGT and a non-turbo engine?

What the heck is a 4/8 probe?

If you don't want an engine monitor
What did I say that indicated I didn't want an engine monitor? In fact, I called my mechanic today and he said he knows someone that is taking an EDM700 out of their 172 and I could have it for $100 plus installation labor charge.


then take it up to a decent altitude, just keep leaning it until it gets rough. It will get rough. Then richen it until roughness goes away. Even if the engine really sputters or even quits from leaning too quickly, it will recover within 3 seconds of pushing the mixture. Or set up the mixture for your best power (speed), and then lean it out a little more until you lose a couple knots or so on speed. That's most likely where you want to be.

That might be an acceptable procedure, but now that I know why it actually makes sense to me.

Look. I'm really sorry that I got a little upset, but that was the kind of condescending answer I have always gotten from other people and it wasn't good enough for me. That is why I searched and asked the question here. And I was thrilled at all the time some people put into formulating an answer for me.

And now I even know what a stoichiometric mixture is. And after a little more research I know why it is never completely achieved in internal combustion engines.
 
Wow. Just wow. You divorce a guy that decides he wants a boot? :lol:
The boot wasn't his idea. It was my boot but I didn't have the time or the desire to remove it after I placed it.

;)

Back to be semi-serious...

Did you mention what kind of plane and engine? :dunno:
Eventually; somewhere around post #8. And I got some really good answers too.

By the way, I paid for the plane and almost everything else too. He was lucky he didn't get the other boot from the other direction.
 
Ben I enjoyed all 25 minutes of the video. You did a LOT of work :)
Jenna, welcome to the board. You ask good questions, and are clearly in it for the learn. Refreshing.
 
Last edited:
Why the attitude? Most of the people did a good job of answering the questions I wanted answered.

Because most of the time on here, the answers go way beyond what was asked, and in a number of cases the person asking question is even more confused than when they first asked the question. Then the thread ends up being a ****ing contest on who can show they know the most trivial crap.

In the past, all I would get when I asked was stupid answers like this one:
Well, I'm glad I can provide stupid answers. I will make sure to provide more of them while giving flight training so my students the full experience of my ineptitude.
What the heck is a 4/8 probe?
4channel/8channel probe. One for each cylinder. Cylinder head and exhaust gas.
What did I say that indicated I didn't want an engine monitor? In fact, I called my mechanic today and he said he knows someone that is taking an EDM700 out of their 172 and I could have it for $100 plus installation labor charge.
I've seen a number of people say "I don't need to waste money on an engine monitor, I've got the single probe that came from the factory."
That might be an acceptable procedure, but now that I know why it actually makes sense to me.

Look. I'm really sorry that I got a little upset, but that was the kind of condescending answer I have always gotten from other people and it wasn't good enough for me. That is why I searched and asked the question here. And I was thrilled at all the time some people put into formulating an answer for me.

And now I even know what a stoichiometric mixture is. And after a little more research I know why it is never completely achieved in internal combustion engines.

It happens.

I disagree with checking the EGT on takeoff and climb. Keep an eye on the CHT - that's the more important number to prevent engine overheating.
 
I disagree with checking the EGT on takeoff and climb. Keep an eye on the CHT - that's the more important number to prevent engine overheating.

So, how do you recommend keeping the engine properly leaned in the climb then?

Yes, CHT is very important in the climb as well. That doesn't mean EGT is worthless. :dunno:
 
So, how do you recommend keeping the engine properly leaned in the climb then?

Yes, CHT is very important in the climb as well. That doesn't mean EGT is worthless. :dunno:

How do I do it? I am always as lean as I can and keep the temps below 400ºF. I'm not detonating or pre-igniting, so there's no worry of hurting the engine that way. EGT isn't worthless, I use that to fine tune the mixture in cruise, but for climb out I don't bother to look at it, I just keep the cylinder temps under 400°F. If they don't go over 380-400, you won't get into trouble leaning.

But I also have 6EGTs and 6CHTs. For a single probe plane, I'd err on the side of caution and burn the extra fuel.

I should have said I disagree with the EGT being the primary focus on climbout, not to completely ignore it - although I pretty much do.
 
Last edited:
How do I do it? I am always as lean as I can and keep the temps below 400ºF. I'm not detonating or pre-igniting, so there's no worry of hurting the engine that way. EGT isn't worthless, I use that to fine tune the mixture in cruise, but for climb out I don't bother to look at it, I just keep the cylinder temps under 400°F. If they don't go over 380-400, you won't get into trouble leaning.

Well, you won't have any problems with an early overhaul... But you might not be getting all the power you could be in the climb.

But I also have 6EGTs and 6CHTs. For a single probe plane, I'd err on the side of caution and burn the extra fuel.

Yep - But in this case, we have one EGT and *zero* CHT's.
 
Well, you won't have any problems with an early overhaul... But you might not be getting all the power you could be in the climb.



Yep - But in this case, we have one EGT and *zero* CHT's.

Oh, I'm already not getting max power because after the gear is up and all obstacles are clear, I'm already pulling the prop back to 2300.

At 6Y9, I'm always leaned for max power until the trees are under me.
 
Welcome Jenna. Everyone got you all confused yet?

We're good at that.

I laughed because I see we're up to over 50 posts and no one has mentioned that any or all of the gauges in a typical Skyhawk may just suck. ;)

Ask a CFI that flies it regularly if the EGT or CHT are jacked up compared to what they see in other Skyhawks.

If yes'm is the answer, send it to the shop for a little TLC. ;)
 
Ben I enjoyed all 25 minutes of the video. You did a LOT of work :)
Jenna, welcome to the board. You ask good questions, and are clearly in it for the learn. Refreshing.


Thanks Doc........

I have never been a person who settles for the status quo... Someone has to push the envelope and I get bored with life, whether it be flying /driving /using any tool in its stock form... As for work,,,, Yup,, over 3000 hours of my time created that " unique" toy...:wink2::)..

Glad to see Jenna jumping in with both feet... That gal has spunk..:yes:
 
Last edited:
The boot wasn't his idea. It was my boot but I didn't have the time or the desire to remove it after I placed it.

Eventually; somewhere around post #8. And I got some really good answers too.

By the way, I paid for the plane and almost everything else too. He was lucky he didn't get the other boot from the other direction.


:lol:



Welcome to POA :D

I for one am glad you are here..... Boots and all. ;)



Jenna, If we handed out call sign names like they do it the Military I think "BOOTS" would stick for you. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Just lean it until you get scared, then richen it back up until you aren't scared anymore.

That's how I was taught on the C152s!

I still remember what I asked when he was teaching me: "Uhh.. did the engine just almost shut off?"
 
I have an idea: RTFM (read the friendly manual). In my A/C lean anytime below 70% power if you wish. Lean to just roughness then enrich for smooth operation. In practice this means leaning after reaching cruise altitude at 5000-6000 or above. Most carbureted planes without engine monitoring equip are similar. (RTFM.) LOP is really not very feasible without fuel injection.

I've had excellent engine life following directions.
 
Back
Top