In my case, I deliberately failed to list my one year in 1995/1996 on SSA disability benefits eight years before the OSP investigation, my HIV infection, and the anti-retroviral medications I was taking as detailed in my posts above.So, in the Operation Safe Pilot case was there deliberate omission/lying on the medical, or was it honest slipped my mind , or misread question and answer?
I haven't viewed the cases themselves but FWIW, both criminal fraud and FAR 61.59 fraud require knowledge of falsity and intent to deceive, not just an honest mistake. OTOH, intent to deceive doesn't require mind reading; it'd typically based on likely conduct. In the parlance, "we are deemed to intend the natural consequences of our acts." My old criminal law professor used this example: if I shoot at someone with a loaded gun, my sincerely held desire the bullet stop in mid-air and never reach the person, doesn't negate my intent to kill.So, in the Operation Safe Pilot case was there deliberate omission/lying on the medical, or was it honest slipped my mind , or misread question and answer?
The voice of experience here to anyone even remotely considering doing that, is DON'T!The number of inquiries I get that are fundamentally based in the "I'm thinking of evading" would make hour head ache. Five, yesterday.
Not sure if yours are worse or the "I already evaded" ones I often get.The number of inquiries I get that are fundamentally based in the "I'm thinking of evading" would make your head ache. Five, yesterday.