JB1842
En-Route
http://www.jsonline.com/news/wiscon...to-drunken-flying-plea-a34etak-141529993.html
Gotta love Wisconsin. Not a pilot, and wasn't flying.
Gotta love Wisconsin. Not a pilot, and wasn't flying.
U.S. statutes grant the FAA the authority to fine anyone, including non-certificated pilots, for violating FAA regulations. So in theory this guy could now also get fined by the FAA.
Plea bargaining should be illegal.

U.S. statutes grant the FAA the authority to fine anyone, including non-certificated pilots, for violating FAA regulations. So in theory this guy could now also get fined by the FAA.
what FAA regulation did he violate?
Who says you have to violate something for them to have authority to levy a fine?
(Ducking...)
Plea bargaining should be illegal.
Insurance CEO... dodging...insurance rate increase for a DUI. I think that when he applies for new car insurance the company should go after him, the judge, the county AND the state for intent to defraud because in the end, that's exactly what this is, a FRAUD, this is bunko.Lawrence Schreiber of Muskego, president of Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Wisconsin.
what FAA regulation did he violate?

So who tells the FAA? Seems to me a large federal fine is appropriate. Who's the FSDO and what's their number?First there is the one all-important prerequisite to establish: he "pleaded no contest to operating an aircraft," so it is now (presumably) legally established he was operating an aircraft (I'll have to look into this; many Bimmers are cheaper than many old airplanes.)
After that there are a couple of possible choices: 91.13(a) or (b), careless or reckless operation, or 91.17 alcohol or drugs.
Yeah, I know it is something of a stretch, but I expect Eric Holder to be made head of the FAA any day now....![]()
First there is the one all-important prerequisite to establish: he "pleaded no contest to operating an aircraft," so it is now (presumably) legally established he was operating an aircraft (I'll have to look into this; many Bimmers are cheaper than many old airplanes.)
After that there are a couple of possible choices: 91.13(a) or (b), careless or reckless operation, or 91.17 alcohol or drugs.
Yeah, I know it is something of a stretch, but I expect Eric Holder to be made head of the FAA any day now....![]()
Id also bet that the car fails to meet the rquirements of an ultra light. Id wager that it isn't registered, has no airworthiness, was to low in a populated area has no markings, is out of annual, has no transponder...



