Chicago Hot Dog Litigation

[AdamZ]

So you Chicago folks which is better?

http://start.toshiba.com/news/read.php?rip_id=<[email protected]>&ps=1011

 

[Telemakhos]

Vienna Beef is the classic, but really, it's more a question of marketing than anything else. I'm sure that if anyone were to take two different brand dogs and give them the Chicago treatment (mustard, pickle spear, tomato wedges, pickle relish, sport peppers, celery salt, and poppy seed buns) that the differences would seem miniscule at best.
Personally, I go to a local butcher and get natural casing franks.

 

[Skylane81E]

Sounds like a publicity stunt to me

 

[mikea]

The Red Hot Chicago dogs do taste pretty much the same as Vienna. I think Vienna has a case, especially with Red Hot's "original since 18xxx" claim.

 

[Mason]

NO KETCHUP.

Thank you very much.

 

[Cap'n Jack]

The destroyer of Meigs ate Chicago hot dogs.

 

[wsuffa]

Nathan's. Real dogs.

(we need a "stirring the pot" smilie).

 

[AdamZ]

Nathan's. Real dogs.

(we need a "stirring the pot" smilie).

love the snap!

and fixed it for ya Bill

 

[ScottM]

Nathan's. Real dogs.

Is that legal to use dogs in meats for human consumption?

 

[slacktide]

Nathan's. Real dogs.

(we need a "stirring the pot" smilie).

What? No. Sabrett.