How do you determine what the aircraft is worth?
Some are toys..By the value of what it does for me. An airplane is just a tool, a tool is worth what it does for you.
What I'm willing to pay for it.
What factors are part of that decision?
Whatever the market can bear...........
Some are toys..
How did you determine the price you'd pay for the 310?
How does that effect what you will pay for a certain aircraft?I start with a budget and look at all the planes that fit my wish list. If I can't find any acceptable in my price range I will increase my budget. If I find a bunch that satisfy both, I tighten up the criteria.
Even as a toy though, the airplane is still a tool, a tool of recreation rather than occupation is all.
Don't quibble over what the aircraft is used for or you'll be off on a tangent again. Just tell us what factors you use to determine the buying price of aircraft.
Problem with Vref, is its rediculously unreliable. I had my plane evaled recently and was told there was no value given for upgrades over stock. Dig egt/cht, dig tach, speed mods, etc... What's even funnier, or sad spending on how you look at it, I was told the brand new Garmin GDL88 was only worth about half of what it was installed 6 months later.
I understand there is no such the as a return on installed equip, but C'mon man, seriously?
My point is this....
You can take two planes side by side and try to value them, but realistically, the plane is worth what the buyer is willing to pay for. If the seller knows what he has, and the buyer doesn't understand the equipment list, the buyers balk at the higher price and call it unrealistic. The inverse is true as well, but usually uncommon unless it's an estate sale.
I paid $8k over Vref for my Archer, because I knew what I was looking at. I coulda bought one at Vref, but I'd spend $20k to bring it up to the same as mine now. I can see the value, but many times financiers and brokers cannot. In the first year I have owned it, I have dumped just over $20k into it. Don't expect a return of that, but I'm also not going to let someone say it only Vrefs at this, so here is my offer at Vref.
I decide what I want in the plane. Avionics, engine, paint and interior. If all that is fairly new I figure what it would cost me to bring the average plane to that level. I don't look for cheap.
"The Market" proved that a G-500 and a 430w have no added resale value when installed.
I decide what I want in the plane. Avionics, engine, paint and interior. If all that is fairly new I figure what it would cost me to bring the average plane to that level. I don't look for cheap.
"The Market" proved that a G-500 and a 430w have no added resale value when installed.
I disagree, they add to the value of one airplane compared to another similar one with a 6-pack and a couple KX170's. Do they add the installed cost? Nope. But all things being equal, the better avionics packages sell for more money in most airplanes. A G500 and a GTN 650, wouldn't help an old beater 150, but it's great in a 182 or a 210. It depends on the market for the airplane, your old 310 is a bad example, most of those old birds are flown by old guys or are used for building time, not a good market for a glass panel. The old guys are still flying the airplane they bought in 1985 and the time builders want cheap multi time.
Wow, your list missed the most critical thing, Airframe. If it doesn't have a clean airframe, the deal is a loser unless you are buying it as a donor plane for the rest of the stuff. Airframe repair costs are not only really expensive and time consuming, they reduce the resale value of the plane for having been done. Most inexpensive planes, airframe repairs, even moderate corrosion remediation, is not economically viable, you can replace the airframe cheaper.
This is true. I'll take a nasty looking bad paint, cloudy windows, and old engine anyday when the aircraft has a clean shiney interior. all that other stuff can be fixed. corrosion can't.
This nasty looking aircraft sold for 5k, no one could see the nice no corrosion interior