sba55
En-Route
That I have seen. Very nice
http://oudaily.com/news/2010/dec/06/column-nude-awakening-tsa-and-privacy/
http://oudaily.com/news/2010/dec/06/column-nude-awakening-tsa-and-privacy/
That I have seen. Very nice
http://oudaily.com/news/2010/dec/06/column-nude-awakening-tsa-and-privacy/
Right on! I really do believe that the path to Orwellian surveillance is a slippery slope.Amen. And people who say that we shouldn't care if we have nothing to hide are people that have never lived under the kind of security state we're headed toward.
Right on! I really do believe that the path to Orwellian surveillance is a slippery slope.
If we have nothing to hide, why not put cameras in every room in our homes? Tap every phone line? Monitor every communique? The TSA is simply a series of baby steps towards the complete evaporation of individual rights and freedoms, perpetrated by a government who "is doing this for our own good."
I really don't want to live in a security state. The TSA should have stopped at hardened cockpit doors, metal detectors, x-rays, and explosives sniffers. All non-invasive, non-creepy, and practical.
I don't get it. You have told me before that we need less or smaller scope of government?
Under normal circumstances I'd say I told you so. But, as I have told so with such vehemence and frequency already the phrase has lost all meaning. Therefore, I will be replacing it with the phrase, I have informed you thusly.
It is directed to those that support these steps in the past. This started right after 911 and a lot of people supported anything to keep themselves safe. Civil libertarians were vilified. Time to acknowledge that the civil libertarians were right and work with them to solve this mess created in the name of national security.I don't get it.
Scott, it felt like you had directed an attack against me personally ("I told YOU so") that was completely unwarranted.It is directed to those that support these steps in the past. This started right after 911 and a lot of people supported anything to keep themselves safe. Civil libertarians were vilified. Time to acknowledge that the civil libertarians were right and work with them to solve this mess created in the name of national security.
It is from the show Big Bang Theory, which by your reaction I would take it you do not watch. It was not meant as an attack on you, but was meant to highlight that supporting demagoguery over reason will lead you to eventually regret one's decisions with a little humor.Scott, it felt like you had directed an attack against me personally ("I told YOU so") that was completely unwarranted.
It is from the show Big Bang Theory, which by your reaction I would take it you do not watch. It was not meant as an attack on you, but was meant to highlight that supporting demagoguery over reason will lead you to eventually regret one's decisions.
We are a passive audience trapped in a theatre of the absurd — apparently too absorbed in brilliantly orchestrated drama to realize it’s all just a play.
bazinga!
Bazinga!
I was paged. What do you need from me?
Right on! I really do believe that the path to Orwellian surveillance is a slippery slope.
If we have nothing to hide, why not put cameras in every room in our homes? Tap every phone line? Monitor every communique? The TSA is simply a series of baby steps towards the complete evaporation of individual rights and freedoms, perpetrated by a government who "is doing this for our own good."
I really don't want to live in a security state. The TSA should have stopped at hardened cockpit doors, metal detectors, x-rays, and explosives sniffers. All non-invasive, non-creepy, and practical.
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?
There ya go.Screwed