Anyone gone back to a passive headset after using noise cancelling?

denverpilot said:
P.S. And I think something is very wrong with them if a passive DC is quieter than the Lightspeeds.

I keep my old DCs at the hangar for those days when I just get a desire to go flying and the flight bag is at home. They’re never quieter than any of the ANRs I’ve ever worn.
Click to expand...
Agree, I like my ZULU3s and passenger gets my older Lightspeed. Mic boom broke and they fixed for free.
 
172andyou said:
For the sake of others, not to convince you.

ANR is *far* more effective than passive. It is simply objectively true that it blocks more sound. Now, whether it's worth the dramatically higher cost is a legit question since ANR and passive both bring sound levels down to safe ones. But in terms of the amount of sound reaching the ear drum, ANR is the hands down winner.
Click to expand...

I've done a bunch of research on this since my original post. I've come to the same conclusion that you have.
 
172andyou said:
For the sake of others, not to convince you.

ANR is *far* more effective than passive. It is simply objectively true that it blocks more sound. Now, whether it's worth the dramatically higher cost is a legit question since ANR and passive both bring sound levels down to safe ones. But in terms of the amount of sound reaching the ear drum, ANR issue the hands down winner.
Click to expand...
Some data, please. Including attenuation plots and including representative sampling of multiple models. Your claims are IMO completely over the top.
 
I've gone from ANR to in-ear Halos from Quiet Technologies. As a matter of fact I flew to St Simon's Island a couple of weeks ago, wore the Halos down and a pair of Bose A20s on the way back and seriously couldn't tell the difference. But I would never wear an over the ear passive headset.
 
172andyou said:
For the sake of others, not to convince you.

ANR is *far* more effective than passive. It is simply objectively true that it blocks more sound. Now, whether it's worth the dramatically higher cost is a legit question since ANR and passive both bring sound levels down to safe ones. But in terms of the amount of sound reaching the ear drum, ANR is the hands down winner.
Click to expand...
That's only if you're comparing over-the-ear head phones. The "in ear" passives have equivalent specs to the ANR.

Furhter, the place where ANR excels over even the passive (old David Clamps, etc....) over the ear is in LOW FREQUENCY noise which is not really the stuff you're worried about in hearing protection. The passive over the years do a pretty good (26db or so) suppression of the higher frequency stuff.
 
Well, first off, I take an article that is written by purveyors of ANR headsets as bible.
Second, their methodology is bogus. There's a difference between an ANR heaset with the ANR turned off and designed to be passive headset.
 
flyingron said:
Well, first off, I take an article that is written by purveyors of ANR headsets as bible.
Second, their methodology is bogus. There's a difference between an ANR heaset with the ANR turned off and designed to be passive headset.
Click to expand...

So give me a better source. I agree that industry sources should be looked at with suspicion, but equally I'm a scientist and found that write up to be pretty decent with no major gaps. While it did test ANR headsets, it talked more broadly about tradeoffs, but I'm willing to look at other stuff if you have something.

airdale said:
So the sweeping pronouncements in your post #40 were based on this level of research ?
Click to expand...

No. What were yours based on?
 
172andyou said:
So give me a better source. I agree that industry sources should be looked at with suspicion, but equally I'm a scientist and found that write up to be pretty decent with no major gaps. While it did test ANR headsets, it talked more broadly about tradeoffs, but I'm willing to look at other stuff if you have something.
Click to expand...
For what. All they are saying is their and other headphones the ANR on are quieter than with the ANR off. Duh. It doesn't compare passive-only headphones (over the ear or in the year) at all. Given the 2K-4K range of hearing damage (Yes, there are some research at lower frequency, but that's not well developed), the curves for the ANR on and ANR off lines are pretty much coincident.

What ANR does when you turn it on is sharply decrease the lower frequency stuff which is a lot of the prop noise. You can do this with a passive but it takes a good seal (either an occlusive ear plug like the in-the-ear headphones provide or a pretty high amount of clamping pressure by the over the ear passives). That's not to say that an ANR isn't going to be more comfortable (less clamping pressure, less fatigue from the LF noise), but it's not the case that it's doing anything special to prevent hearing loss and it's not doing anything that you can't do with the in the ear (if you can tolerate them).

Of course, after all that I'll tell you I do fly with Lightspeed Zulu.2's. While my wife's ClarityAloft have equal (and in some cases better performance) I was never fond of them and I can't wear them now (unless I pull my hearing aids out).
 
Idk, since I got the Bose A20 I miss hearing the engine and often just use the passive mode. I don't fly more than a few hours a month though.
 
172andyou said:
... No. What were yours based on?
Click to expand...
I did not make any sweeping pronouncements. I reported on my experience, basically the same as @flyingron's. I actually was trained as an engineer and scientist and know that making sweeping pronouncements like yours in post #40 is somewhere between dangerous and ludicrous. That's why I asked to see the supporting data. I am still waiting.
 
Never left!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1888.JPG
    IMG_1888.JPG
    170.7 KB · Views: 12
Lndwarrior said:
A while ago Lightspeed told me that the repair would be $200.

I just can't see spending $200 To repair a nine year old headset.

The responses here have got me thinking about a new anr headset. Probably not Zulus though, because of this problem.
Click to expand...

I can sell you a like new/used headset if you need something. I have Lightspeeds and David Clarks now :-)
 
I have a first generation Lightspeed Zulu and there is no way I would go back to my H10-13.4 headsets, although I liked them a lot. There is no comparison. The Lightspeeds are still working great, and I have replaced the ear seals once in 10 years. Batteries are no big deal. A change every 25 hours or so. I keep a spare set of AAs in my flight bag.
 
Another factor wrt the upper frequencies where in-the-ear passive shines is that those upper frequencies are in the range of human speech. I have never worn a headset that makes ATC easier to understand than my Clarity Aloft sets. Really, it is not a small difference. I guess that's why they named the company "Clarity."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top